Loading...
Male bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) are more active and behaviourally flexible than workers
Chow, Pizza ; Robert, Theo ; Donnelly, Sophie ; Hochard, Kevin D
Chow, Pizza
Robert, Theo
Donnelly, Sophie
Hochard, Kevin D
Citations
Altmetric:
Advisors
Editors
Other Contributors
EPub Date
Publication Date
2026
Submitted Date
Collections
Files
Article - AAM
Adobe PDF, 1.17 MB
- Embargoed until 2026-12-31
Other Titles
Abstract
Sex role differences can influence ecological and evolutionarily important traits like activity level and behavioural flexibility. In bumblebees, female workers are the main foragers for the colony, whereas males (drones) have minimal responsibility. However, males become solitary foragers once they leave the colony, suggesting that increased activity level and behavioural flexibility are crucial for their survival. Here, we conducted a laboratory experiment to compare male and female bumblebees’ active time in a novel environment (using an ‘activity’ task) as well as their colour-reward associative learning ability and behavioural flexibility (with a simultaneous two-choice discrimination-reversal colour learning task). As predicted, males were more active in the novel environment than females. Males and females showed comparable performance in learning the colour-reward association, but males demonstrated enhanced behavioural flexibility when the reward contingency changed. Males’ active time may reflect their exploratory behaviour (e.g., pre-mating patrolling), and their enhanced flexibility suggests their readiness to find new profitable flowers when exploited flowers decrease in quality. These results highlight the importance of these behavioural and cognitive traits for males, which may increase their chance of finding mates and improve their foraging efficiency.
Citation
Chow, P. K. Y., Robert, T., Donnelly, S., & Hochard, K. D. (2026). Male bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) are more active and behaviourally flexible than workers. Animal Cognition, vol(issue), pages. DOI
Publisher
Springer Nature
Journal
Animal Cognition
Research Unit
DOI
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Type
Article
Language
Description
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at [DOI available on publication].
Series/Report no.
ISSN
1435-9448
EISSN
1435-9456
ISBN
ISMN
Gov't Doc
Test Link
Sponsors
This study is supported by the Sustainability and Environmental Research Knowledge Exchange Institute, funding PKYC and KH (PS00054).
