Loading...
Stop making them mask: Synchronous video, asynchronous text, and the future of inclusive qualitative methods
Pimblett, Ceri Hardey, Mariann
Pimblett, Ceri
Hardey, Mariann
Citations
Altmetric:
Advisors
Editors
Other Contributors
Affiliation
EPub Date
Publication Date
2026-07-20
Submitted Date
Collections
Files
Loading...
Accepted version
Adobe PDF, 274.76 KB
Other Titles
Abstract
Purpose: This paper argues that interview modality selection in qualitative research involving neurodivergent participants is a methodological validity decision, not primarily an ethical or welfare consideration. It examines how the choice between synchronous video and asynchronous text shapes the cognitive conditions under which data is generated and, consequently, the quality and authenticity of the data produced.
Theoretical basis: The argument draws on cognitive load theory, masking research, social presence theory, and reflexive thematic analysis standards to establish modality selection as a validity concern rather than a welfare adjustment.
Findings: Synchronous video interviewing imposes social performance, disclosure, and processing demands on neurodivergent participants that compete directly with the cognitive work of generating authentic responses. Asynchronous text participation substantially reduces these demands. Neither modality is inherently superior; the fit between format, participant profile, and research topic determines data quality.
Practical implications: The paper provides a framework of eight design decisions to guide modality selection, question design, consent framing, and methodological reporting in qualitative research with neurodivergent populations.
Originality/value: The paper reframes the choice of interview modality as a validity concern and introduces a practitioner-facing framework applicable across qualitative research involving neurodivergent participants in organisational and workplace contexts.
Citation
Pimblett, C., & Hardey, M. (2026). Stop making them mask: Synchronous video, asynchronous text, and the future of inclusive qualitative methods. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, vol(issue), pages. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-05-2026-0172
Publisher
Emerald
Journal
International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Type
Article
Language
Description
This author accepted manuscript is deposited under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC) licence. This means that anyone may distribute, adapt, and build upon the work for non-commercial purposes, subject to full attribution. If you wish to use this manuscript for commercial purposes, please contact permissions@emerald.com
Series/Report no.
ISSN
EISSN
1093-4537