Loading...
Shared meaning in children’s evaluations of art: A computational analysis
Schepman, Astrid Rodway, Paul Kirkham, Julie A. Lambert, Jordana Locke, Anastasia
Schepman, Astrid
Rodway, Paul
Kirkham, Julie A.
Lambert, Jordana
Locke, Anastasia
Citations
Altmetric:
Advisors
Editors
Other Contributors
Affiliation
EPub Date
Publication Date
2018-11-30
Submitted Date
Collections
Other Titles
Abstract
Art appreciation is often considered highly individual, but research has shown that there is also a shared element, which may be due to shared meanings and associations triggered by artworks. In the current analysis, we examined semantically based justifications given to aesthetic evaluations of abstract and representational artworks provided by 80 primary schoolchildren, aged 4, 5, 8, and 10 years. Using a computational semantic similarity analysis technique (UMBC Ebiquity), the authors found that children showed evidence for shared meaning in response to representational but not abstract art. The effect was present from age 4 through to age 10. In addition, it was found that the presence of semantic elements in the justifications boosted aesthetic appreciation, especially of abstract artworks. This suggests that individually constructed meaning is key to aesthetic appreciation and is, to an extent, independent from the meaning that might be assumed to be inherent in artworks, particularly if it is representational. The authors evaluate their findings in relation to aesthetic and developmental theories and make suggestions for future research. They argue that the current data, alongside calibrating analyses that apply their randomization and semantic analysis protocol to children’s picture naming responses, further demonstrate the robustness of the computational semantic similarity analysis method, with great potential for further studies in semantic interpretation of art or other types of stimuli.
Citation
Schepman, A., Kirkham, J., Rodway, P., Lambert, J. & Locke, A. (2018). Shared meaning in children’s evaluations of art: A computational analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 12(4), 440-452.
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Journal
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Type
Article
Language
en
Description
© 2018, American Psychological Association. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the final, authoritative version of the article. Please do not copy or cite without authors permission. The final article will be available, upon publication, via its DOI: 10.1037/aca0000159
Series/Report no.
ISSN
1931-3896
EISSN
1931-390X