• Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer

      Eccles, Suzanne A.; Aboagye, Eric O.; Ali, Simak; Anderson, Annie S.; Armes, Jo; Berditchevski, Fedor; Blaydes, Jeremy P.; Brennan, Keith; Brown, Nicola J.; Bryant, Helen E.; Bundred, Nigel J.; Burchell, Joy M.; Campbell, Anna M.; Carroll, Jason S.; Clarke, Robert B.; Coles, Charlotte E.; Cook, Gary J.; Cox, Angela; Curtin, Nicola J.; Dekker, Lodewijk V.; dos Santos Silva, Isabel; Duffy, Stephen W.; Easton, Douglas F.; Eccles, Diana M.; Edwards, Dylan R.; Edwards, Joanne; Evans, D. Gareth; Fenlon, Deborah F.; Flanagan, James M.; Foster, Claire; Gallagher, William M.; Garcia-Closas, Montserrat; Gee, Julia M. W.; Gescher, Andy J.; Goh, Vicky; Groves, Ashley M.; Harvey, Amanda J.; Harvie, Michelle N.; Hennessy, Bryan T.; Hiscox, Stephen; Holen, Ingunn; Howell, Sacha J.; Howell, Anthony; Hubbard, Gill; Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J.; Hunter, Myra S.; Jasani, Bharat; Jones, Louise J.; Key, Timothy J.; Kirwan, Cliona C.; Kong, Anthony; Kunkler, Ian H.; Langdon, Simon P.; Leach, Martin O.; Mann, David J.; Marshall, John F.; Martin, Lesley A.; Martin, Stewart G.; Macdougall, Jennifer E.; Miles, David W.; Miller, William R.; Morris, Joanna R.; Moss, Sue M.; Mullan, Paul; Natrajan, Rachel; O’Connor, James P.; O’Connor, Rosemary; Palmieri, Carlo; Pharoah, Paul D. P.; Rakha, Emad A.; Reed, Elizabeth; Robinson, Simon P.; Sahai, Erik; Saxton, John M.; Schmid, Peter; Smalley, Matthew J.; Speirs, Valerie; Stein, Robert; Stingl, John; Streuli, Charles H.; Tutt, Andrew N. J.; Velikova, Galina; Walker, Rosemary A.; Watson, Christine J.; Williams, Kaye J.; Young, Leonie S.; Thompson, Alastair M.; Imperial College London ; University of Dundee ; University of Southampton ; University of Birmingham ; University of Manchester ; University of Sheffield ; Kings College London ; University College London ; Cancer Research UK/University of Cambridge ; Newcastle University ; University of Nottingham ; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine ; Queen Mary University of London ; University of Glasgow ; University of East Anglia ; University College Dublin ; The Institute of Cancer Research ; University of Cardiff ; University of Leeds ; Royal College of Surgeons Ireland ; University of Chester ; University of Oxford ; University of Edinburgh ; National Cancer Research Institute ; Queen’s University Belfast ; University College Cork ; University of Leicester ; Princess Alice Hospice ; University of Sussex ; University of Liverpool ; London Research Institute ; Brunel University ; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS (BioMed Central, 2013-10-01)
      Introduction: Breast cancer remains a significant scientific, clinical and societal challenge. This gap analysis has reviewed and critically assessed enduring issues and new challenges emerging from recent research, and proposes strategies for translating solutions into practice. Methods More than 100 internationally recognised specialist breast cancer scientists, clinicians and healthcare professionals collaborated to address nine thematic areas: genetics, epigenetics and epidemiology; molecular pathology and cell biology; hormonal influences and endocrine therapy; imaging, detection and screening; current/novel therapies and biomarkers; drug resistance; metastasis, angiogenesis, circulating tumour cells, cancer ‘stem’ cells; risk and prevention; living with and managing breast cancer and its treatment. The groups developed summary papers through an iterative process which, following further appraisal from experts and patients, were melded into this summary account. Results The 10 major gaps identified were: (1) understanding the functions and contextual interactions of genetic and epigenetic changes in normal breast development and during malignant transformation; (2) how to implement sustainable lifestyle changes (diet, exercise and weight) and chemopreventive strategies; (3) the need for tailored screening approaches including clinically actionable tests; (4) enhancing knowledge of molecular drivers behind breast cancer subtypes, progression and metastasis; (5) understanding the molecular mechanisms of tumour heterogeneity, dormancy, de novo or acquired resistance and how to target key nodes in these dynamic processes; (6) developing validated markers for chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity; (7) understanding the optimal duration, sequencing and rational combinations of treatment for improved personalised therapy; (8) validating multimodality imaging biomarkers for minimally invasive diagnosis and monitoring of responses in primary and metastatic disease; (9) developing interventions and support to improve the survivorship experience; (10) a continuing need for clinical material for translational research derived from normal breast, blood, primary, relapsed, metastatic and drug-resistant cancers with expert bioinformatics support to maximise its utility. The proposed infrastructural enablers include enhanced resources to support clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo tumour models; improved access to appropriate, fully annotated clinical samples; extended biomarker discovery, validation and standardisation; and facilitated cross-discipline working. Conclusions With resources to conduct further high-quality targeted research focusing on the gaps identified, increased knowledge translating into improved clinical care should be achievable within five years.