Enhancing undergraduate nurses’ online learning engagement: A mixed methods study
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Name:
Shennan, Smith and Chapman 2026.pdf
Embargo:
2027-01-06
Size:
997.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Request:
Accepted version
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate a structured, student-focused online learning environment (OLE) for delivering applied sciences for nursing. Background: Online learning can impair the learning experience for students, but it promotes flexible access to study. Design: A mixed-methods study was used to explore and analyze students’ experiences and preferences for two different delivery models. The original online module space consisted of an information repository. The new OLE was a structured bioscience for nursing module, designed to scaffold student learning to achieve learning outcomes using a variety of different methods to support diverse learning styles. Outcome measures used were student satisfaction, student assessments and qualitative data from module feedback questionnaires and focus groups. Methods: Questionnaires on the OLE experience were administered to students (n = 52) and results compared with previous module feedback. Two student focus groups (n = 7) explored these responses in more depth. Results: A redesigned OLE, with student learning as its focus, improved student engagement with the module space. Interactive learning experiences made students feel better prepared for assessment. Students gained greater digital capabilities by using the OLE. The flexibility and potential to re-watch teaching sessions was welcomed. Conclusions: OLEs should be designed collaboratively with learning technologists and regularly reviewed to avoid overwhelming students with irrelevant or outdated materials. Flexible, online learning is ubiquitous, requiring a user-friendly and effective OLE for nursing students.Citation
Shennan, S., Smith, C., & Chapman, H. M. (2026). Enhancing undergraduate nurses’ online learning engagement: A mixed methods study. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, vol(issue), pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2025.12.004Publisher
ElsevierJournal
Teaching and Learning in NursingType
ArticleLanguage
enDescription
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Organization for Associate Degree Nursing.ISSN
1557-3087EISSN
1557-2013Sponsors
Scoping research: understanding the contribution of nurses to improve the health and well-being of children, adults and older people with learning disabilities, now and for the future | Funder: University of West London (UWL)ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.teln.2025.12.004
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Identifying barriers to the adoption of Certificated and Experiential Accreditation/Recognition of Prior Learning: A global perspectiveTalbot, Jon; University of Chester (2019-01-25)The presentation reviews research into practice in the UK and beyond to identify barriers to adoption and examples where there has been a systemic increase. The various terms used to describe practice are outlined and its application in the UK and beyond briefly reviewed. The presentation will refer to national, institutional and pedagogical constraints to the wider adoption of practice. Two national examples are cited where practice appears most widespread- the USA and France. Possible explanations are cited and examples of institutional practice in each country described. Finally lessons from a global perspective are used to highlight opportunities and constraints in the UK. -
Repurposing MOOC learning for academic credit: A survey of practice in University Work Based Learning departments in England and WalesTalbot, Jon; University of Chester (2017-11-30)This small study is an investigation into the potential for converting learning from MOOCs into credit bearing qualifications in universities. The mechanism for achieving such conversion is the use of what is variously known as the Accreditation or Recognition of Prior Learning (A/RPL). The evidence suggests such practices in the UK are heavily concentrated in Work Based Learning (WBL) departments. This study investigated practices in 26 WBL departments in England and Wales. The results indicate there is very little awareness of the potential of MOOC learning as the basis for A/RPL claims among tutors in WBL departments. Moreover there are relatively few departments which have sufficiently flexible procedures to integrate MOOC learning into curricula. At a time when policy makers are seeking the removal of barriers to the recognition of informal and non-formal learning it seems there are few opportunities for those completing MOOC courses in England and Wales to convert them into recognised qualifications. The study provides evidence that in the UK completion of MOOC courses is unlikely to result in accredited qualifications. -
Who will accredit MOOC learning? a survey of work based learning departments in English and Welsh universitiesTalbot, Jon; University of Chester (The Open University, 2016-02-26)The presentation is of a small survey to determine whether Work based learning departments have sufficient flexibility to admit MOOC certificates as the basis for APL/RPL claims. The main finding is that there is low awareness of MOOCs among tutors such that is unlikely many would recognise the value of a MOOC certificate as the basis for a claim for past learning.

