General cognitive performance declines with female age and is negatively related to fledging success in a wild bird
Affiliation
University of Western Australia; Macquarie University; University of Cape Town; University of ExeterPublication Date
2022-12-21
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Identifying the causes and fitness consequences of intraspecific variation in cognitive performance is fundamental to understand how cognition evolves. Selection may act on different cognitive traits separately or jointly as part of the general cognitive performance (GCP) of the individual. To date, few studies have examined simultaneously whether individual cognitive performance covaries across different cognitive tasks, the relative importance of individual and social attributes in determining cognitive variation, and its fitness consequences in the wild. Here, we tested 38 wild southern pied babblers (<i>Turdoides bicolor</i>) on a cognitive test battery targeting associative learning, reversal learning and inhibitory control. We found that a single factor explained 59.5% of the variation in individual cognitive performance across tasks, suggestive of a general cognitive factor. GCP varied by age and sex; declining with age in females but not males. Older females also tended to produce a higher average number of fledglings per year compared to younger females. Analysing over 10 years of breeding data, we found that individuals with lower general cognitive performance produced more fledglings per year. Collectively, our findings support the existence of a trade-off between cognitive performance and reproductive success in a wild bird.Citation
Soravia, C., Ashton, B. J., Thornton, A., & Ridley, A. R. (2022). General cognitive performance declines with female age and is negatively related to fledging success in a wild bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 289(1989), article-number 20221748. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1748Publisher
The Royal SocietyAdditional Links
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2022.1748Type
ArticleLanguage
enDescription
© 2022 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society.ISSN
0962-8452EISSN
1471-2954Sponsors
This work was funded by the Australian Government Research Training Program through a scholarship awarded to C.S. at the University of Western Australia. The Kuruman River Reserve (KRR), the study site where this research was based, was financed by the Universities of Cambridge and Zurich, the MAVA Foundation and the European Research Council (grant no. 294494 to Tim Clutton-Brock) and received logistical support from the Mammal Research Institute of the University of Pretoria.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1098/rspb.2022.1748
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


