Theodicy and Hope in Hans Frei's Theology
| dc.contributor.author | Fulford, Ben | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Collins, Drew | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Fulford, Ben | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-02T15:08:27Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-02T15:08:27Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.identifier | https://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/629391/Fulford%20Theodicy%20and%20Hope%20in%20Frei%20%28postprint%29.pdf?sequence=2 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Fulford, B. (2026). Theodicy and Hope in Hans Frei's Theology. In D. Collins & B. Fulford (Eds.) Hans Frei and the Future of Theology (pp. TBC). Wipf and Stock. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10034/629391 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Susan Neiman has argued that the problem of evil in modern European philosophy concerns the absence of intelligibility, meaning and justice that threatens the trust in the world we need to understand it and act in it. In light of Frei's reading of H. Richard Niebuhr's theology as theodicy in similar terms, we may read Frei’s own Christological understanding of providence as a kind of theodicy, at once sombre, hopeful and restrained, with a practical, political force. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | N/A | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wipf and Stock | en_US |
| dc.relation.url | https://wipfandstock.com/ | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hans Frei | en_US |
| dc.subject | Theodicy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Providence | en_US |
| dc.title | Theodicy and Hope in Hans Frei's Theology | en_US |
| dc.type | Book chapter | en_US |
| dc.date.updated | 2025-05-02T05:32:14Z | |
| dc.title.book | Hans Frei and the Future of Theology | en_US |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-04-01 | |
| rioxxterms.identifier.project | N/A | en_US |
| rioxxterms.version | AM | en_US |
| rioxxterms.type | Book chapter | |
| dc.date.deposited | 2025-05-02 | en_US |
