Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorScudds, Annie
dc.contributor.authorLasikiewicz, Nicola
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-02T14:34:15Z
dc.date.available2024-10-02T14:34:15Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-02
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/629063/Scudds_WAT%27s%20up.pdf?sequence=6
dc.identifier.citationScudds, A., & Lasikiewicz, N. (2024). WAT’s up? Exploring the impact of wearable activity trackers on physical activity and wellbeing: A systematic research review. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, vol(issue), pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-024-00442-6en_US
dc.identifier.issn2366-5963en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s41347-024-00442-6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/629063
dc.descriptionThe version of record of this article, first published in [Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science], is available online at Publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41347-024-00442-6en_US
dc.description.abstractWearable activity trackers (WATs) can facilitate engagement in physical activity. Yet, there may be an additional psychological impact, which can influence their effectiveness. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to assess the impact of wrist-based WATs on physical activity and subsequent psychological wellbeing in healthy adults. The review was carried out using PRISMA guidelines and registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF). An initial search was conducted in December 2022 with a follow-up in October 2023. Databases included PsychInfo, PsycArticles, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus. Nine studies were selected for inclusion and reviewed. Most studies comprised white adults with an average age of 21.5 to 49 years. Participants were employed or students with a mostly normal BMI. Changes in self-efficacy for exercise, depressive symptoms, mental health and general wellbeing, quality of life and burnout were evaluated. Half the studies reported a WAT-related increase in physical activity engagement. Four studies assessed self-efficacy for exercise, with half observing an improvement post-intervention. Three studies assessed mental health and depressive symptoms with one observing improvement and two observing no change. The remaining studies included measures of burnout and quality of life, where only burnout scores improved one-month post-intervention. Although the quality of the studies reviewed was acceptable, only 4 included a suitable control/comparison group. Further, the measurement of psychological wellbeing varied considerably. In sum, the results indicate that the effect of WATs on physical activity and subsequent psychological wellbeing is understudied. Further research is required to fully elucidate these relationships.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnfundeden_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41347-024-00442-6en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectExerciseen_US
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_US
dc.subjectWellbeingen_US
dc.subjectActivity trackersen_US
dc.titleWAT’s up? Exploring the Impact of Wearable Activity Trackers on Physical Activity and Wellbeing: A Systematic Research Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn2366-5963en_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Chesteren_US
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Technology in Behavioral Scienceen_US
dc.date.updated2024-10-02T14:14:43Z
dc.date.accepted2024-09-22
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUnfundeden_US
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2025-12-31
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.date.deposited2024-10-02en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Scudds_WAT's up.pdf
Size:
705.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Request:
Article - VoR

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/