Review Protocol: Assessing the outcomes and impact of Professional doctorate programmes in health and social care on the individual, their profession, their employing organisation and wider society: A comprehensive systematic review
Name:
Revision DImpactReview HMC et ...
Embargo:
2025-12-31
Size:
518.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Request:
Article - AAM
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Campbell systematic review. This protocol will evaluate and synthesise the empirical evidence, both qualitative and quantitative, regarding the outcomes and impact from undertaking professional doctorates from within any health and social care profession. This review’s objectives are to find out (in relation to health and / or social care): • What is known about the outcomes and impact of completing (or not completing) a professional doctorate in health and / or social care on: o the individual professional o the employing organisation? o the profession? o service users and the wider society? • How do use the findings from this review to inform educators, higher education institutions, professionals, investors in employing organisations and policy makers? • What further research will be needed to answer any knowledge gaps or recommendations • Where possible, we will identify and report on any demographic data and discuss their relevance to the impact and outcomes from professional doctorates.Citation
Chapman, H. M., McSherry, R., Bettany-Saltikov, J., Mohan, M., & Spencer, D. (2024 - forthcoming). Review Protocol: Assessing the outcomes and impact of Professional doctorate programmes in health and social care on the individual, their profession, their employing organisation and wider society: A comprehensive systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, vol(issue), pages. doiPublisher
WileyJournal
Campbell Systematic ReviewsAdditional Links
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18911803Type
ArticleDescription
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.EISSN
1891-1803Sponsors
UnfundedCollections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/