Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCox, Peter
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Paul
dc.contributor.editorScott, David
dc.contributor.editorBell, Emma
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-06T10:43:03Z
dc.date.available2024-09-06T10:43:03Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-19
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/628983/5.COXTAYLOR.pdf?sequence=4
dc.identifier.citationCox, P., & Taylor, P. (2025). Arthur St. John: Tolstoyan Abolitionism in Practice. In D. G. Scott & E. Bell (Eds.), Envisaging Abolition (87–107). Bristol University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781529234770en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.51952/9781529234800.ch005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/628983
dc.descriptionThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copy edited version of a chapter published in Envisioning Abolition. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [Cox, P. & Taylor, P (2025). Arthur St. John: Tolstoyan Abolitionism in Practice. In D. G. Scott & E. Bell (Eds.), Envisaging Abolition. Bristol: Bristol University Press] is available online at: https://doi.org/10.51952/9781529234800.ch005
dc.description.abstractThere is no easy dividing line between reform and abolition. The Howard League for Penal Reform was formed in 1921 from the merger of two bodies, the Howard Association, founded in 1866, and the Penal Reform League, founded in 1907. While the ideas of John Howard are still widely remembered and acknowledged, the Tolstoyan abolitionism that led to the foundation of the PRL and its principal inspiration and first chair, Arthur St. John, is almost entirely forgotten. This chapter explores the writings of St. John and his colleagues, and the networks of people and activities which they initiated. Characterised by idealism and often dismissed as utopian in aspiration, their actions were paradoxically pragmatic and collaborative, feeding not insignificantly into the Prison System Enquiry Committee of 1919 and ultimately to the publication of English Prisons Today. The biographical approach allows us to situate the analysis of penal systems within a set of larger ideas of social change concerning religious freedom, education, social norms, and social and economic justice, for example. Though Tolstoyan abolitionism is often closely intertwined with Quaker approaches or erased within Fabian narratives, it remains distinctive in its politics and vision.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnfundeden_US
dc.publisherBristol University Pressen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/envisioning-abolitionen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectPunishmenten_US
dc.subjectAbolitionen_US
dc.subjectPrison reformen_US
dc.titleArthur St. John: Tolstoyan Abolitionism in Practiceen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Chesteren_US
dc.rights.embargodate2026-03-19
dc.title.bookEnvisioning Abolitionen_US
dc.date.accepted2024-06-20
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUnfundeden_US
rioxxterms.versionAMen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2026-03-19
dc.source.beginpage87–107
dc.date.deposited2024-09-05en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
5.COXTAYLOR.pdf
Embargo:
2026-03-19
Size:
253.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Request:
Book chapter

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International