Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPradhan, Tej Nikhil
dc.contributor.authorViswanathan, Vibhu Krishnan
dc.contributor.authorBadge, Ravi
dc.contributor.authorPradhan, Nikhil
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T12:26:44Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T12:26:44Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-24
dc.date.submitted2024-04-04
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/628815/Single-stage%20revision.pdf?sequence=2
dc.identifier.citationPradhan, T. N., Viswanathan, V. K., Badge, R., & Pradhan, N. (2024). Single-stage revision in the management of prosthetic joint infections after total knee arthroplasty - A review of current concepts. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 52, 102431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102431en_US
dc.identifier.issn0976-5662en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102431en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/628815
dc.description© 2024 The Authorsen_US
dc.description.abstractProsthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA); and the gold standard surgical approach involves a two-staged, revision TKA (TSR). Owing to the newer, emerging evidence on this subject, there has been gradual shift towards a single-stage revision approach (SSR), with the purported benefits of mitigated patient morbidity, decreased complications and reduced costs. However, there is still substantial lacuna in the evidence regarding the safety and outcome of the two approaches in chronic PJI. This study aimed to comprehensively review of the literature on SSR; and evaluate its role within Revision TKA post PJI. The narrative review involved a comprehensive search of the databases (Embase, Medline and Pubmed), conducted on 20th of January 2024 using specific key words. All the manuscripts discussing the use of SSR for the management of PJI after TKA were considered for the review. Among the screened manuscripts, opinion articles, letters to the editor and non-English manuscripts were excluded. The literature search yielded a total 232 studies. Following a detailed scrutiny of these manuscripts, 26 articles were finally selected. The overall success rate following SSR is reported to range from 73 % to 100 % (and is comparable to TSR). SSR is performed in PJI patients with bacteriologically-proven infection, adequate soft tissue cover, immuno-competent host and excellent tolerance to antibiotics. The main difference between SSR and TSR is that the interval between the 2 stages is only a few minutes instead of 6 weeks. Appropriate topical, intraoperative antibiotic therapy, followed by adequate postoperative systemic antibiotic cover are necessary to ascertain good outcome. Some of the major benefits of SSR over TSR include reduced morbidity, decreased complications (such as arthrofibrosis or anesthesia-associated adverse events), meliorated extremity function, earlier return to activities, mitigated mechanical (prosthesis-associated) complications and enhanced patient satisfaction. SSR is a reliable approach for the management of chronic PJI. Based on our comprehensive review of the literature, it may be concluded that the right selection of patients, extensive debridement, sophisticated reconstruction strategy, identification of the pathogenic organism, initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy and ensuring adequate follow-up are the key determinants of successful outcome. To achieve this will undoubtedly require an MDT approach to be taken on a case-by-case basis. [Abstract copyright: © 2024 The Authors.]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnfundeden_US
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.journal-cot.com/article/S0976-5662(24)00100-0/fulltexten_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcepissn: 0976-5662
dc.subjectTreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectJointen_US
dc.subjectRevisionen_US
dc.subjectKnee arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectProsthesis-related infectionen_US
dc.subjectReview literatureen_US
dc.subjectTotalen_US
dc.titleSingle-stage revision in the management of prosthetic joint infections after total knee arthroplasty - A review of current conceptsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn2213-3445en_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity College London; Imperial College London; Institute of Orthopedic and Accident Surgery, India; Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Edge Hill University; University of Liverpool; University of Chesteren_US
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Traumaen_US
dc.date.updated2024-06-23T01:25:58Z
dc.date.accepted2024-05-24
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUnfundeden_US
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
dc.date.deposited2024-06-25en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version
Thumbnail
Name:
Single-stage revision.pdf
Size:
977.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Request:
Article - VoR

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/