Single-stage revision in the management of prosthetic joint infections after total knee arthroplasty - A review of current concepts
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Affiliation
University College London; Imperial College London; Institute of Orthopedic and Accident Surgery, India; Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Edge Hill University; University of Liverpool; University of ChesterPublication Date
2024-05-24Submitted date
2024-04-04
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA); and the gold standard surgical approach involves a two-staged, revision TKA (TSR). Owing to the newer, emerging evidence on this subject, there has been gradual shift towards a single-stage revision approach (SSR), with the purported benefits of mitigated patient morbidity, decreased complications and reduced costs. However, there is still substantial lacuna in the evidence regarding the safety and outcome of the two approaches in chronic PJI. This study aimed to comprehensively review of the literature on SSR; and evaluate its role within Revision TKA post PJI. The narrative review involved a comprehensive search of the databases (Embase, Medline and Pubmed), conducted on 20th of January 2024 using specific key words. All the manuscripts discussing the use of SSR for the management of PJI after TKA were considered for the review. Among the screened manuscripts, opinion articles, letters to the editor and non-English manuscripts were excluded. The literature search yielded a total 232 studies. Following a detailed scrutiny of these manuscripts, 26 articles were finally selected. The overall success rate following SSR is reported to range from 73 % to 100 % (and is comparable to TSR). SSR is performed in PJI patients with bacteriologically-proven infection, adequate soft tissue cover, immuno-competent host and excellent tolerance to antibiotics. The main difference between SSR and TSR is that the interval between the 2 stages is only a few minutes instead of 6 weeks. Appropriate topical, intraoperative antibiotic therapy, followed by adequate postoperative systemic antibiotic cover are necessary to ascertain good outcome. Some of the major benefits of SSR over TSR include reduced morbidity, decreased complications (such as arthrofibrosis or anesthesia-associated adverse events), meliorated extremity function, earlier return to activities, mitigated mechanical (prosthesis-associated) complications and enhanced patient satisfaction. SSR is a reliable approach for the management of chronic PJI. Based on our comprehensive review of the literature, it may be concluded that the right selection of patients, extensive debridement, sophisticated reconstruction strategy, identification of the pathogenic organism, initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy and ensuring adequate follow-up are the key determinants of successful outcome. To achieve this will undoubtedly require an MDT approach to be taken on a case-by-case basis. [Abstract copyright: © 2024 The Authors.]Citation
Pradhan, T. N., Viswanathan, V. K., Badge, R., & Pradhan, N. (2024). Single-stage revision in the management of prosthetic joint infections after total knee arthroplasty - A review of current concepts. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 52, 102431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102431Publisher
ElsevierAdditional Links
https://www.journal-cot.com/article/S0976-5662(24)00100-0/fulltextType
ArticleDescription
© 2024 The AuthorsISSN
0976-5662EISSN
2213-3445Sponsors
Unfundedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102431
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/