Web-Based Psychological Interventions for People Living With and Beyond Cancer: Meta-Review of What Works and What Does Not for Maximizing Recruitment, Engagement, and Efficacy.
AuthorsLeslie, Monica; orcid: 0000-0002-0216-7432
Beatty, Lisa; orcid: 0000-0001-8847-8452
Hulbert-Williams, Lee; orcid: 0000-0001-5892-6488
Pendrous, Rosina; orcid: 0000-0002-9085-9876
Cartwright, Tim; orcid: 0000-0001-5967-8092
Jackson, Richard; orcid: 0000-0002-7814-5088
Finding My Way UK Trial Steering Group
Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J; orcid: 0000-0001-9041-5485
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractDespite high levels of psychological distress experienced by many patients with cancer, previous research has identified several barriers to accessing traditional face-to-face psychological support. Web-based psychosocial interventions have emerged as a promising alternative. This meta-review aimed to synthesize evidence on recruitment challenges and enablers, factors that promote engagement and adherence to web-based intervention content, and factors that promote the efficacy of web-based psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer and cancer survivors. We conducted a systematic search of previous reviews that investigated the recruitment, engagement, and efficacy of web-based and app-based psychosocial interventions in adult patients with cancer and cancer survivors. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library database for relevant literature. The search terms focused on a combination of topics pertaining to neoplasms and telemedicine. Two independent authors conducted abstract screening, full text screening, and data extraction for each identified article. A total of 20 articles met eligibility criteria. There was inconsistency in the reporting of uptake and engagement data; however, anxiety about technology and perceived time burden were identified as 2 key barriers. Web-based psychosocial oncology interventions demonstrated efficacy in reducing depression and stress but reported weak to mixed findings for distress, anxiety, quality of life, and well-being. Although no factors consistently moderated intervention efficacy, preliminary evidence indicated that multicomponent interventions and greater communication with a health care professional were preferred by participants and were associated with superior effects. Several consistently cited barriers to intervention uptake and recruitment have emerged, which we recommend future intervention studies address. Preliminary evidence also supports the superior efficacy of multicomponent interventions and interventions that facilitate communication with a health care professional. However, a greater number of appropriately powered clinical trials, including randomized trials with head-to-head comparisons, are needed to enable more confident conclusions regarding which web-based psychosocial oncology interventions work best and for whom. PROSPERO CRD42020202633; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=202633. [Abstract copyright: ©Monica Leslie, Lisa Beatty, Lee Hulbert-Williams, Rosina Pendrous, Tim Cartwright, Richard Jackson, The Finding My Way UK Trial Steering Group, Nicholas J Hulbert-Williams. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 08.07.2022.]
CitationJMIR cancer, volume 8, issue 3, page e36255, article-number 10.2196/36255
DescriptionFrom PubMed via Jisc Publications Router
History: received 2022-01-07, revised 2022-04-12, accepted 2022-05-08
Publication status: epublish
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Visualization for epidemiological modelling: challenges, solutions, reflections and recommendationsDykes, Jason; orcid: 0000-0002-8096-5763; email: email@example.com; Abdul-Rahman, Alfie; orcid: 0000-0002-6257-876X; Archambault, Daniel; Bach, Benjamin; orcid: 0000-0002-9201-7744; Borgo, Rita; orcid: 0000-0003-2875-6793; Chen, Min; orcid: 0000-0001-5320-5729; Enright, Jessica; Fang, Hui; Firat, Elif E.; orcid: 0000-0001-9497-7928; Freeman, Euan; orcid: 0000-0002-6586-6951; et al. (The Royal Society, 2022-08-15)We report on an ongoing collaboration between epidemiological modellers and visualization researchers by documenting and reflecting upon knowledge constructs—a series of ideas, approaches and methods taken from existing visualization research and practice—deployed and developed to support modelling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Structured independent commentary on these efforts is synthesized through iterative reflection to develop: evidence of the effectiveness and value of visualization in this context; open problems upon which the research communities may focus; guidance for future activity of this type and recommendations to safeguard the achievements and promote, advance, secure and prepare for future collaborations of this kind. In describing and comparing a series of related projects that were undertaken in unprecedented conditions, our hope is that this unique report, and its rich interactive supplementary materials, will guide the scientific community in embracing visualization in its observation, analysis and modelling of data as well as in disseminating findings. Equally we hope to encourage the visualization community to engage with impactful science in addressing its emerging data challenges. If we are successful, this showcase of activity may stimulate mutually beneficial engagement between communities with complementary expertise to address problems of significance in epidemiology and beyond. See https://ramp-vis.github.io/RAMPVIS-PhilTransA-Supplement/. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Technical challenges of modelling real-life epidemics and examples of overcoming these’.
New insights into Perrault syndrome, a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder.Faridi, Rabia; orcid: 0000-0001-7788-8755; Rea, Alessandro; orcid: 0000-0002-6204-846X; Fenollar-Ferrer, Cristina; orcid: 0000-0003-4953-8891; O'Keefe, Raymond T; orcid: 0000-0001-8764-1289; Gu, Shoujun; Munir, Zunaira; orcid: 0000-0003-3342-9658; Khan, Asma Ali; orcid: 0000-0002-0894-3439; Riazuddin, Sheikh; orcid: 0000-0001-6012-0192; Hoa, Michael; orcid: 0000-0001-7469-2909; Naz, Sadaf; orcid: 0000-0002-1912-0235; et al. (2021-08-02)Hearing loss and impaired fertility are common human disorders each with multiple genetic causes. Sometimes deafness and impaired fertility, which are the hallmarks of Perrault syndrome, co-occur in a person. Perrault syndrome is inherited as an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by bilateral mild to severe childhood sensorineural hearing loss with variable age of onset in both sexes and ovarian dysfunction in females who have a 46, XX karyotype. Since the initial clinical description of Perrault syndrome 70 years ago, the phenotype of some subjects may additionally involve developmental delay, intellectual deficit and other neurological disabilities, which can vary in severity in part dependent upon the genetic variants and the gene involved. Here, we review the molecular genetics and clinical phenotype of Perrault syndrome and focus on supporting evidence for the eight genes (CLPP, ERAL1, GGPS1, HARS2, HSD17B4, LARS2, RMND1, TWNK) associated with Perrault syndrome. Variants of these eight genes only account for approximately half of the individuals with clinical features of Perrault syndrome where the molecular genetic base remains under investigation. Additional environmental etiologies and novel Perrault disease-associated genes remain to be identified to account for unresolved cases. We also report a new genetic variant of CLPP, computational structural insight about CLPP and single cell RNAseq data for eight reported Perrault syndrome genes suggesting a common cellular pathophysiology for this disorder. Some unanswered questions are raised to kindle future research about Perrault syndrome. [Abstract copyright: © 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.]
Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies Demonstrated in Terms of its Applicability to Nanomaterials.Isigonis, Panagiotis; orcid: 0000-0002-8404-7708; Afantitis, Antreas; Antunes, Dalila; Bartonova, Alena; Beitollahi, Ali; Bohmer, Nils; Bouman, Evert; Chaudhry, Qasim; Cimpan, Mihaela Roxana; Cimpan, Emil; et al. (2020-07-23)Nanotechnologies have reached maturity and market penetration that require nano-specific changes in legislation and harmonization among legislation domains, such as the amendments to REACH for nanomaterials (NMs) which came into force in 2020. Thus, an assessment of the components and regulatory boundaries of NMs risk governance is timely, alongside related methods and tools, as part of the global efforts to optimise nanosafety and integrate it into product design processes, via Safe(r)-by-Design (SbD) concepts. This paper provides an overview of the state-of-the-art regarding risk governance of NMs and lays out the theoretical basis for the development and implementation of an effective, trustworthy and transparent risk governance framework for NMs. The proposed framework enables continuous integration of the evolving state of the science, leverages best practice from contiguous disciplines and facilitates responsive re-thinking of nanosafety governance to meet future needs. To achieve and operationalise such framework, a science-based Risk Governance Council (RGC) for NMs is being developed. The framework will provide a toolkit for independent NMs' risk governance and integrates needs and views of stakeholders. An extension of this framework to relevant advanced materials and emerging technologies is also envisaged, in view of future foundations of risk research in Europe and globally. [Abstract copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.]