• Login / Register
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Support Departments
    • Harvested data
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Support Departments
    • Harvested data
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChesterRepCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUniversity of Chester

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    How Well Are Hand Hygiene Practices and Promotion Implemented in Sierra Leone? A Cross-Sectional Study in 13 Public Hospitals.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    article.pdf
    Size:
    724.7Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Authors
    Lakoh, Sulaiman; orcid: 0000-0002-7639-0004
    Maruta, Anna; orcid: 0000-0002-6417-7273
    Kallon, Christiana
    Deen, Gibrilla F
    Russell, James B W
    Fofanah, Bobson Derrick; orcid: 0000-0003-3276-8949
    Kamara, Ibrahim Franklyn; orcid: 0000-0003-1454-4650
    Kanu, Joseph Sam; orcid: 0000-0003-0799-6907
    Kamara, Dauda
    Molleh, Bailah
    Adekanmbi, Olukemi
    Tavernor, Simon
    Guth, Jamie
    Sagili, Karuna D
    Wilkinson, Ewan; orcid: 0000-0002-2167-8756
    Show allShow less
    Publication Date
    2022-03-23
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) result in millions of avoidable deaths or prolonged lengths of stay in hospitals and cause huge economic loss to health systems and communities. Primarily, HAIs spread through the hands of healthcare workers, so improving hand hygiene can reduce their spread. We evaluated hand hygiene practices and promotion across 13 public health hospitals (six secondary and seven tertiary hospitals) in the Western Area of Sierra Leone in a cross-sectional study using the WHO hand hygiene self-Assessment framework in May 2021. The mean score for all hospitals was 273 ± 46, indicating an intermediate level of hand hygiene. Nine hospitals achieved an intermediate level and four a basic level. More secondary hospitals 5 (83%) were at the intermediate level, compared to tertiary hospitals 4 (57%). Tertiary hospitals were poorly rated in the reminders in workplace and institutional safety climate domains but excelled in training and education. Lack of budgets to support hand hygiene implementation is a priority gap underlying this poor performance. These gaps hinder hand hygiene practice and promotion, contributing to the continued spread of HAIs. Enhancing the distribution of hand hygiene resources and encouraging an embedded culture of hand hygiene practice in hospitals will reduce HAIs.
    Citation
    International journal of environmental research and public health, volume 19, issue 7, page 3787
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10034/626857
    Type
    article
    Description
    From Europe PMC via Jisc Publications Router
    History: ppub 2022-03-01, epub 2022-03-23
    Publication status: Published
    Funder: World Health Organization; Grant(s): 001
    Collections
    Harvested data

    entitlement

     

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      No Difference in Penetrance between Truncating and Missense/Aberrant Splicing Pathogenic Variants in MLH1 and MSH2: A Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database Study

      Dominguez-Valentin, Mev; orcid: 0000-0001-7856-0057; email: Mev.Dominguez.Valentin@rr-research.no; Plazzer, John-Paul; orcid: 0000-0001-5114-4301; email: johnpaul.plazzer@gmail.com; Sampson, Julian R.; email: Sampson@cardiff.ac.uk; Engel, Christoph; orcid: 0000-0002-7247-282X; email: christoph.engel@imise.uni-leipzig.de; Aretz, Stefan; orcid: 0000-0002-5228-1890; email: stefan.aretz@uni-bonn.de; Jenkins, Mark A.; email: m.jenkins@unimelb.edu.au; Sunde, Lone; email: l.sunde@rn.dk; Bernstein, Inge; email: i.bernstein@rn.dk; Capella, Gabriel; orcid: 0000-0002-4669-7320; email: capella.gabriel@gmail.com; Balaguer, Francesc; orcid: 0000-0002-0206-0539; email: fprunes@clinic.cat; et al. (MDPI, 2021-06-28)
      Background. Lynch syndrome is the most common genetic predisposition for hereditary cancer. Carriers of pathogenic changes in mismatch repair (MMR) genes have an increased risk of developing colorectal (CRC), endometrial, ovarian, urinary tract, prostate, and other cancers, depending on which gene is malfunctioning. In Lynch syndrome, differences in cancer incidence (penetrance) according to the gene involved have led to the stratification of cancer surveillance. By contrast, any differences in penetrance determined by the type of pathogenic variant remain unknown. Objective. To determine cumulative incidences of cancer in carriers of truncating and missense or aberrant splicing pathogenic variants of the MLH1 and MSH2 genes. Methods. Carriers of pathogenic variants of MLH1 (path_MLH1) and MSH2 (path_MSH2) genes filed in the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD) were categorized as truncating or missense/aberrant splicing according to the InSiGHT criteria for pathogenicity. Results. Among 5199 carriers, 1045 had missense or aberrant splicing variants, and 3930 had truncating variants. Prospective observation years for the two groups were 8205 and 34,141 years, respectively, after which there were no significant differences in incidences for cancer overall or for colorectal cancer or endometrial cancers separately. Conclusion. Truncating and missense or aberrant splicing pathogenic variants were associated with similar average cumulative incidences of cancer in carriers of path MLH1 and path_MSH2.
    • Thumbnail

      Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP): a scoping review of dermatology clinical practice guidelines

      Haw, W.Y.; orcid: 0000-0003-1526-7202; Al‐Janabi, A.; orcid: 0000-0002-2094-0556; Arents, B.W.M.; orcid: 0000-0001-6884-8014; Asfour, L.; orcid: 0000-0002-0049-8377; Exton, L.S.; orcid: 0000-0003-0073-1885; Grindlay, D.; orcid: 0000-0002-0992-7182; Khan, S.S.; orcid: 0000-0003-4996-9106; Manounah, L.; orcid: 0000-0001-6129-6624; Yen, H.; orcid: 0000-0002-2649-2563; Chi, C.‐C.; orcid: 0000-0001-5699-0283; et al. (2021-07-05)
      Summary: Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) play a critical role in standardizing and improving treatment outcomes based on the available evidence. It is unclear how many CPGs are available globally to assist clinicians in the management of patients with skin disease. Objectives: To search for and identify CPGs for dermatological conditions with the highest burden globally. Methods: We adapted a list of 12 dermatological conditions with the highest burden from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study 2019. A systematic literature search was done to identify CPGs published between October 2014 to October 2019. The scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) framework. Results: A total of 226 CPGs were included. Melanoma had the greatest representation in the CPGs, followed by dermatitis and psoriasis. Skin cancers had a relatively high CPG representation but with lower GBD disease burden ranking. There was an uneven distribution by geographical region, with resource‐poor settings being under‐represented. The skin disease categories of the CPGs correlated weakly with the GBD disability‐adjusted life‐years metrics. Eighty‐nine CPGs did not have funding disclosures and 34 CPGs were behind a paywall. Conclusions: The global production of dermatology CPGs showed wide variation in geographical representation, article accessibility and reporting of funding. The number of skin disease CPGs were not commensurate with its disease burden. Future work will critically appraise the methodology and quality of dermatology CPGs and lead to the production of an accessible online resource summarizing these findings.
    • Thumbnail

      MicroRNA-142 Critically Regulates Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Homeostasis and Function.

      Roberts, Luke B; orcid: 0000-0003-1143-304X; Jowett, Geraldine M; orcid: 0000-0002-8436-6637; Read, Emily; orcid: 0000-0002-0376-2989; Zabinski, Tomas; Berkachy, Rita; orcid: 0000-0002-2053-5913; Selkirk, Murray E; orcid: 0000-0002-6274-6014; Jackson, Ian; Niazi, Umar; orcid: 0000-0001-7176-8883; Anandagoda, Nelomi; Araki, Masatake; et al. (2021-05-21)
      Innate lymphoid cells are central to the regulation of immunity at mucosal barrier sites, with group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) being particularly important in type 2 immunity. In this study, we demonstrate that microRNA(miR)-142 plays a critical, cell-intrinsic role in the homeostasis and function of ILC2s. Mice deficient for miR-142 expression demonstrate an ILC2 progenitor-biased development in the bone marrow, and along with peripheral ILC2s at mucosal sites, these cells display a greatly altered phenotype based on surface marker expression. ILC2 proliferative and effector functions are severely dysfunctional following infection, revealing a critical role for miR-142 isoforms in ILC2-mediated immune responses. Mechanistically, and expression are regulated by miR-142 isoforms in ILC2s, impacting ILC2 phenotypes as well as the proliferative and effector capacity of these cells. The identification of these novel pathways opens potential new avenues to modulate ILC2-dependent immune functions. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2021 The Authors.]
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.