• Login / Register
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Support Departments
    • Harvested data
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Support Departments
    • Harvested data
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChesterRepCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUniversity of Chester

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Risk stratified breast cancer screening: UK healthcare policy decision-making stakeholders’ views on a low-risk breast screening pathway

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    12885_2020_Article_7158_nlm.xml
    Size:
    94.58Kb
    Format:
    XML
    Download
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    additional-files.zip
    Size:
    17.18Kb
    Format:
    Unknown
    Download
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    12885_2020_Article_7158.pdf
    Size:
    573.7Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Authors
    McWilliams, Lorna
    Woof, Victoria G.
    Donnelly, Louise S.
    Howell, Anthony
    Evans, D. Gareth
    French, David P.; orcid: 0000-0002-7663-7804; email: david.french@manchester.ac.uk
    Publication Date
    2020-07-22
    Submitted date
    2020-05-07
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract: Background: There is international interest in risk-stratification of breast screening programmes to allow women at higher risk to benefit from more frequent screening and chemoprevention. Risk-stratification also identifies women at low-risk who could be screened less frequently, as the harms of breast screening may outweigh benefits for this group. The present research aimed to elicit the views of national healthcare policy decision-makers regarding implementation of less frequent screening intervals for women at low-risk. Methods: Seventeen professionals were purposively recruited to ensure relevant professional group representation directly or indirectly associated with the UK National Screening Committee and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Three themes are reported: (1) producing the evidence defining low-risk, describing requirements preceding implementation; (2) the impact of risk stratification on women is complicated, focusing on gaining acceptability from women; and (3) practically implementing a low-risk pathway, where feasibility questions are highlighted. Conclusions: Overall, national healthcare policy decision-makers appear to believe that risk-stratified breast screening is acceptable, in principle. It will however be essential to address key obstacles prior to implementation in national programmes.
    Citation
    BMC Cancer, volume 20, issue 1, page 680
    Publisher
    BioMed Central
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10034/625355
    Type
    article
    Description
    From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications Router
    History: received 2020-05-07, accepted 2020-07-09, registration 2020-07-10, pub-electronic 2020-07-22, online 2020-07-22, collection 2020-12
    Publication status: Published
    Funder: Manchester Biomedical Research Centre; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100014653; Grant(s): IS-BRC-1215-200007
    Funder: Programme Grants for Applied Research; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007602; Grant(s): RP-PG-1214-20016
    Funder: Breast Cancer Now; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009794; Grant(s): 2018RP005
    Collections
    Harvested data

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.