Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEllis, James; email: james_ellis1998@me.com
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, David John; email: drdavidedwards@aol.com
dc.contributor.authorThwala, Wellington Didibhuku; email: didi-bhukut@uj.ac.za
dc.contributor.authorEjohwomu, Obuks; orcid: 0000-0001-7098-8999; email: obuks.ejohwomu@manchester.ac.uk
dc.contributor.authorAmeyaw, Ernest Effah; email: ernest.ameyaw@northumbria.ac.uk
dc.contributor.authorShelbourn, Mark; email: mark.shelbourn@bcu.ac.uk
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-20T00:26:06Z
dc.date.available2021-06-20T00:26:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-18
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/624998/buildings-11-00260.xml?sequence=2
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/624998/buildings-11-00260.pdf?sequence=3
dc.identifier.citationBuildings, volume 11, issue 6, page e260
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/624998
dc.descriptionFrom MDPI via Jisc Publications Router
dc.descriptionHistory: accepted 2021-06-13, pub-electronic 2021-06-18
dc.descriptionPublication status: Published
dc.description.abstractThis research explores the failure of competitively tendered projects in the UK construction industry to procure the most suited contractor(s) to conduct the works. Such work may have equal relevance for other developed nations globally. This research seeks to teach clients and their representatives that “lowest price” does not mean “best value”, by presenting a case study of a successfully negotiated tender undertaken by a small-to-medium enterprise (SME) contractor; SME studies are relatively scant in academic literature. By applying the “lessons learnt” principle, this study seeks to improve future practice through the development of a novel alternative procurement option (i.e., negotiation). A mixed philosophical stance combining interpretivism and pragmatism was used—interpretivism to critically review literature in order to form the basis of inductive research to discuss negotiation as a viable procurement route, and pragmatism to analyse perceptions of tendering and procurement. The methods used follow a three-stage waterfall process including: (1) literature review and pilot study; (2) quantitative analysis of case study data; and (3) qualitative data collection via a focus group. Our research underscores the need to advise clients and their representatives of the importance of understanding the scope of works allowed within a tender submission before discounting it based solely on price. In addition, we highlight the failings of competitive tendering, which results in increased costs and project duration once the works commence on site. These findings provide new contemporary insight into procurement and tendering in the construction industry, with emphasis on SME contractors, existing relationships, and open-book negotiation. This research illustrates the adverse effects of early cost estimates produced without first securing a true understanding of project buildability and programming. Our work concludes with a novel insight into an alternative procurement option that involves early SME contractor involvement in an open-book environment, without the need for a third-party cost control.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsLicence for this article: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceeissn: 2075-5309
dc.subjectUK construction
dc.subjecttendering and procurement
dc.subjectrework
dc.subject“race to the bottom”
dc.subjectnegotiation
dc.subjectpredicted cost
dc.titleA Case Study of a Negotiated Tender within a Small-to-Medium Construction Contractor: Modelling Project Cost Variance
dc.typeother
dc.date.updated2021-06-20T00:26:06Z
dc.date.accepted2021-06-13


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
buildings-11-00260.xml
Size:
8.996Kb
Format:
XML
Thumbnail
Name:
buildings-11-00260.pdf
Size:
1.469Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record