Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShields, Gemma E.; orcid: 0000-0003-4869-7524; email: gemma.shields@manchester.ac.uk
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Lindsey
dc.contributor.authorWells, Adrian; orcid: 0000-0001-7713-1592
dc.contributor.authorCapobianco, Lora; orcid: 0000-0001-6877-8650
dc.contributor.authorVass, Caroline; orcid: 0000-0002-6385-2812
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T15:43:19Z
dc.date.available2021-06-15T15:43:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-04
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/624953/40271_2020_439_MOESM1_ESM.pdf?sequence=2
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/624953/40271_2020_Article_439_nlm.xml?sequence=3
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/624953/40271_2020_Article_439.pdf?sequence=4
dc.identifier.citationThe Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, volume 14, issue 4, page 399-412
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/624953
dc.descriptionFrom Springer Nature via Jisc Publications Router
dc.descriptionHistory: registration 2020-07-17, online 2020-08-04, pub-electronic 2020-08-04, pub-print 2021-07
dc.descriptionPublication status: Published
dc.descriptionFunder: Programme Grants for Applied Research; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007602; Grant(s): RP-PG-1211-20011
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Publications reporting discrete choice experiments of healthcare interventions rarely discuss whether patient and public involvement (PPI) activities have been conducted. This paper presents examples from the existing literature and a detailed case study from the National Institute for Health Research-funded PATHWAY programme that comprehensively included PPI activities at multiple stages of preference research. Reflecting on these examples, as well as the wider PPI literature, we describe the different stages at which it is possible to effectively incorporate PPI across preference research, including the design, recruitment and dissemination of projects. Benefits of PPI activities include gaining practical insights from a wider perspective, which can positively impact experiment design as well as survey materials. Further benefits included advice around recruitment and reaching a greater audience with dissemination activities, amongst others. There are challenges associated with PPI activities; examples include time, cost and outlining expectations. Overall, although we acknowledge practical difficulties associated with PPI, this work highlights that it is possible for preference researchers to implement PPI across preference research. Further research systematically comparing methods related to PPI in preference research and their associated impact on the methods and results of studies would strengthen the literature.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing
dc.rightsLicence for this article: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourcepissn: 1178-1653
dc.sourceeissn: 1178-1661
dc.subjectPractical Application
dc.titleUtilising Patient and Public Involvement in Stated Preference Research in Health: Learning from the Existing Literature and a Case Study
dc.typearticle
dc.date.updated2021-06-15T15:43:19Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
40271_2020_439_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Size:
317.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Thumbnail
Name:
40271_2020_Article_439_nlm.xml
Size:
115.8Kb
Format:
XML
Thumbnail
Name:
40271_2020_Article_439.pdf
Size:
876.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record