How downplaying or exaggerating crime severity in a confession affects perceived guilt
dc.contributor.author | Holt, G. A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Palmer, Matthew A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-12T15:08:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-12T15:08:16Z | |
dc.identifier | https://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/623854/Holt%20and%20Palmer%202020%20Accepted%20version%2025%20Sept%202020.docx.pdf?sequence=4 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Holt, G. A., & Palmer, M. A. (2020). How downplaying or exaggerating crime severity in a confession affects perceived guilt. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1837027 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13218719.2020.1837027 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10034/623854 | |
dc.description | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychiatry, Psychology and Law on forthcoming, available online: doi to be added when published | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study investigated how judgments of guilt are influenced by factual errors in confessions that either amplified or downplayed the severity of the crime. Participants read a confession statement and a police report. Information in the confession statement either was consistent with the facts of the crime in the police report, the suspect admitted to a worse crime than described in the police report, or the suspect admitted to a lesser crime than described in the police report. Mediation analyses showed that, compared to consistent confessions, both types of directional errors reduced judgments of guilt. Inconsistencies that made the suspect look better—but not those that made the suspect look worse—also increased judgments of guilt via a direct effect. Confessions that contain errors that appear to exaggerate the severity of the crime prompt no higher judgments of suspect guilt than confessions that are consistent with the facts of the crime. However, errors in confessions that are perceived to downplay the severity of the crime can prompt an increased perception of suspect guilt, when compared to a consistent confession. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law | en_US |
dc.relation.url | https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tppl20/current | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.subject | wrongful conviction | en_US |
dc.subject | inconsistencies | en_US |
dc.subject | juror decision-making | en_US |
dc.subject | false confession | en_US |
dc.subject | attribution theory | en_US |
dc.title | How downplaying or exaggerating crime severity in a confession affects perceived guilt | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1934-1687 | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | University of Chester; University of Tasmania | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law | en_US |
or.grant.openaccess | Yes | en_US |
rioxxterms.funder | This research was funded by a grant from the Community Law and Policing research group and the Institute for Social Change at the University of Tasmania, Australia, and by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship awarded to Glenys Holt. | en_US |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | not coded | en_US |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_US |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-12-14 | |
rioxxterms.publicationdate | 2020-12-14 | |
dc.dateAccepted | 2020-09-25 | |
dc.date.deposited | 2020-10-12 | en_US |
dc.indentifier.issn | 1321-8719 | en_US |