Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManning, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T14:41:20Z
dc.date.available2020-08-20T14:41:20Z
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/623599/Economic%20Rationality%20and%20Corporate%20Social%20Irresponsibility-%20An%20Illustrative%20Review%20of%20Social%20Capital%20Theory.pdf?sequence=1
dc.identifier.citationManning, P. (20120. Economic Rationality and Corporate Social Irresponsibility: An Illustrative Review of Social Capital Theory. In R. Tench, W. Sun, & B Jones (Eds.), Corporate Social Irresponsibility: A Challenging Concept: Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability, Vol 4 (pp.111 – 134). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781780529981en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/623599
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this chapter is to argue that utility maximisa- AU:1 tion, taken from a narrow economic understanding of rationality, frames contemporary business school pedagogy and management theory. The chapter will illustrate this observation by detailing the rational framing assumptions in social capital literature. The chapter will argue that these framing rational notions foster a perspective that inclines towards excessive self-interest as well as a concomitant lack of fellow feeling or morality. Methodology Literature review Findings The chapter demonstrates that the narrow economic understanding of rationality that predominates as the framing notion in management theory tends towards amorality as it privileges individual self-interest. In consequence, the significance of ethics and cooperation are under-reported and under-emphasised which leads to CSI. These AU:2 observations are discussed with reference to social capital theory. Research implications To consider the significance of the underacknowledged rational background or framing perspectives in distorting theory and empirical research in social capital literature, and more generally in contemporary management literatures and business school pedagogy. Social implication There is a need to re-examine and challenge the validity and application of rational notions in contemporary management literatures and pedagogy. Originality The chapter identifies that a narrow utility maximising understanding of rationality frames and therefore inhibits current management literatures and pedagogy, including social capital literature.en_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S2043-9059(2012)0000004014/full/htmlen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectGeneral reviewen_US
dc.subjectsocial capitalen_US
dc.subjecteconomic rationalityen_US
dc.titleEconomic Rationality and Corporate Social Irresponsibility: An Illustrative Review of Social Capital Theory.en_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeeds Metropolitan Universityen_US
or.grant.openaccessYesen_US
rioxxterms.funderNoneen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectNoneen_US
rioxxterms.versionAMen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1108/S2043-9059(2012)0000004014en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2212-11-14
rioxxterms.publicationdate2012-11-14
dc.dateAccepted2012
dc.date.deposited2020-08-20en_US
dc.indentifier.issn2043-9059en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Economic Rationality and Corporate ...
Embargo:
2212-11-14
Size:
195.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Request:
Book chapter

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/