Reflections on 20 years of the Journal of Public Affairs: Public affairs in a rapidly changing and globalising world
AbstractAs we commence the twentieth year of publication of the Journal of Public Affairs [JPA],we reflect on having published 20 volumes of the journal, comprising 80 issues with over 1000 academic articles and close to 10 million words of text and illustrations. This endeavour has been superbly supported by a network of 1500 authors and 2000 reviewers contributing from across the world. This remarkable body of work has been generated by an international collection of academics, aficionados, businesses, experts, governments, interest groups, practitioners associated with the vast industry of public affairs. The editorial team would like to acknowledge and thank all our contributors and reviewers for their support over the past two decades.
CitationHarris, P. & Moss, D. (2020). Reflections on 20 years of the Journal of Public Affairs: Public affairs in a rapidly changing and globalising world. Journal of Public Affairs, 20, 1 .
JournalJournal of Public Affairs
DescriptionEditorial for the 20th Year Anniversary Issue which includes a number of world leading figures This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Harris, P. & Moss, D. (2020). Reflections on 20 years of the Journal of Public Affairs: Public affairs in a rapidly changing and globalising world. Journal of Public Affairs, 20, 1 ., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2095. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Archaeodeath as digital public mortuary archaeologyWilliams, Howard; University of ChesterSince 2013, I have been writing an academic WordPress weblog (blog) – Archaeodeath: The Archaeology and Heritage of Death & Memory. In earlier publications, I have published preliminary reflections on the benefits of Archaeodeath as ‘digital public mortuary archaeology’ (DPMA), considering how it affords a mode of open-access public dissemination of mortuary archaeology, and a venue for debating and critiquing the archaeology and heritage of death and memory (Meyers and Williams 2014; Williams and Atkin 2015). Building on these discussions, this chapter reviews five-and-a-half years of the Archaeodeath blogging to the end of 2018, presenting the character of the blog’s content and its reception, identifying challenges and limitations of the medium, and (equally significantly in understanding its utility) considering key decisions regarding how I choose not to deploy this blog. I identify Archaeodeath as more than outreach or engagement, but as a digital platform increasingly both integral to, and transforming, my academic teaching and research practice.
Jews, Pagans, sceptics and emperorsGraham, Elaine L.; University of Chester (2014-02-25)Far from becoming marginal to society, religion is returning to public prominence as a significant factor in global politics and civil society. Yet this is not a religious revival by any means, due to the enduring influence of a completely different social and cultural trajectory: of secularism and religious scepticism. We find ourselves between a ‘rock’ of religious resurgence – or at least its renewed visibility – and the ‘hard place’ of secularism. How do we negotiate the unprecedented co-existence of these two discourses? And in particular, how do people of faith give an account of their motivations and values in a world that is more sensitive than ever to religious belief and practice, yet often struggles to accommodate it into secular discourse? I intend to answer this by calling for a renewal of the practice of Christian apologetics: the task of offering a reasoned defence or rationale for one’s faith.
The Sage Handbook of International Corporate and Public AffairsHarris, Phil; Fleisher, Craig; University of Chester and Aurora WDC (SAGE, 2017-02-01)The management and oversight of public affairs (PA) is a critical boardroom skill that resides with the Chief Executive and those engaged in multi-complex strategic political management work, particularly those working at and across the international business, government and politics interface. This has become of paramount importance to modern business in a very competitive and rapidly globalizing world where strong and focused leadership on corporate communication, issues management, governmental and regulatory issues and soft power (Nye, 2004) can often be pivotal to whether an organization fails or succeeds (Griffin, 2016, Sun and Harris, 2014, Fleisher, 2012; Titley, 2003). As one senior executive commented in a conversation with one of the authors, there are 1) those who are good at public affairs and politics and their businesses succeed, and 2) those who do not understand the subject and they are either no more or in decline.