Maximal punching performance in amateur boxing: An examination of biomechanical and physical performance-related characteristics
dc.contributor.advisor | Lamb, Kevin | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Thomson, Edd | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Smith, Grace | |
dc.contributor.author | Stanley, Edward | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-13T09:01:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-13T09:01:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Stanley, E, R. (2020). Maximal punching performance in amateur boxing: An examination of biomechanical and physical performance-related characteristics (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, UK. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10034/623170 | |
dc.description.abstract | Punches in boxing are intricate actions requiring the coordinated and synergistic recruitment of leg, trunk and arm musculature. Maximal punches can have a marked impact on the outcomes of boxing contests. Currently, there is an absence of research appraising the biomechanics and physical performance-related qualities associated with boxing punches, and as such, there are no practical guidelines pertaining to resistance training and its impact upon these important characteristics. In this respect, coaches and boxers are reliant consequently upon non-scientific approaches to training and contest preparation. Thus, the purpose of this thesis was to quantify the biomechanics and physical performance-related qualities associated with maximal punching techniques common to amateur boxing, and investigate the extent to which resistance training enhances such features. Study 1 quantified the three-dimensional kinetics and kinematics of maximal punches common to boxing competition to identify the differences between punch types (straights, hooks, and uppercuts), whilst Study 2 investigated the movement variability of these measures across punch types. These studies revealed significant differences for the majority of kinetic and kinematic variables between punch types. High within-subject, between-subject, and biological variability were recorded for the same variables across punch types, independent of the amount of boxing experience. These findings confirm that kinetic and kinematic characteristics vary from punch to punch, with boxers appearing to manipulate kinematic variables in order to achieve a consistent intensity and end-product. Study 3 quantified the relationships between physical performance-related traits and kinetic and kinematic qualities of maximal punches, and revealed moderate-to-large associations with muscular strength and power. From this, Study 4 appraised the extent to which strength and contrast resistance training enhanced maximal punch biomechanics and physical performance-related qualities. The findings highlighted that contrast training was superior among male amateur boxers over a six-week intervention, though strength training alone also brought about improvements. This current research has advanced our understanding of maximal punching and the influence of resistance training on a variety of its determinants. Nonetheless, future research is required to identify if the same findings can be generalised to higher standards of boxing and whether alternative strength and conditioning strategies are equally, or more effective. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Chester | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Boxing | en_US |
dc.subject | Physical performance | en_US |
dc.subject | Punches | en_US |
dc.title | Maximal punching performance in amateur boxing: An examination of biomechanical and physical performance-related characteristics | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis or dissertation | en_US |
dc.publisher.department | University of Chester | en_US |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2020-08-08 | |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.rights.usage | The full-text may be used and/or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes provided that: - A full bibliographic reference is made to the original source - A link is made to the metadata record in ChesterRep - The full-text is not changed in any way - The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. - For more information please email researchsupport.lis@chester.ac.uk |