Understanding UK Rewards-based Crowdfunding as an Alternative Source of Entrepreneurial Finance
dc.contributor.advisor | Harris, Phil | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Lam, Wing | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Ying | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-30T08:49:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-30T08:49:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Zhao, Y. (2019). Understanding UK Rewards-based Crowdfunding as an Alternative Source of Entrepreneurial Finance (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, UK. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10034/623133 | |
dc.description.abstract | Entrepreneurial financing plays a vital role in the survival and viability of businesses (Crosetto & Regner, 2018; Mason & Harrison, 1991; Signori & Vismara, 2017; Zhao et al., 2019). Research studies and financial commentators have suggested that reward-based crowdfunding (RBC) plays an increasingly important role in the process of business start-ups (Baeck et al., 2014; Bilau & Pires, 2018; Lelo de Larrea et al., 2019; Mollick, 2014). However, a review of literature indicates that little is known about the field of RBC from a theoretical perspective. Therefore, the main aim of the thesis is to address the knowledge gap by developing a conceptual framework to advance understanding of the RBC funding process through using a signalling theory lens. The author adopted a pragmatist epistemological stance. This study collected publicly available data of 636 UK start-up projects on a RBC platform, Kickstarter, from September to December in 2017 and repeated this for the same period in 2018. It was found that signal observability (the size and quality of the fundraiser’s network) play a significant role in crowdfunding success across all projects. Whereas, prosocial intention (charitable purpose) plays a stronger role in predicting the likelihood of the success of projects with a medium goal. This study identifies and evaluates how the key factors (project quality, project intention and signal observability) impact on crowdfunding’s success, as well as investigates the interplay between different actors (signallers, receivers and signals) in the RBC market. A further important contribution of this work arises from the use of rich qualitative data in addition to the quantitative research approaches previously utilised by others (Bi, Liu and Usman, 2017; Kunz et al., 2017). The thesis makes contributions to both theory and practice. The findings have major implications for different parties including: policy makers, practitioners, researchers and educators. It provides an insight for practitioners considering the adoption of a crowdfunding approach and the knowledge and recommendations in running a successful RBC campaign. It also helps nascent entrepreneurs to reconstruct their financing strategy through the better understanding of the position of RBC in entrepreneurial financing. An important implication is that this study can help policy makers to better understand the RBC industry, which is essential in developing relevant policies in this under-governed area. Finally, this research contributes to growing knowledge and interest in entrepreneurial finance, especially in the online alternative finance market, which is beneficial for both researchers and educators. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Chester | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Entrepreneurial financing | en_US |
dc.subject | Reward-based crowdfunding | en_US |
dc.subject | Signalling theory lens | en_US |
dc.title | Understanding UK Rewards-based Crowdfunding as an Alternative Source of Entrepreneurial Finance | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis or dissertation | en_US |
dc.publisher.department | University of Chester | en_US |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2020-01-23 | |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.rights.usage | The full-text may be used and/or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes provided that: - A full bibliographic reference is made to the original source - A link is made to the metadata record in ChesterRep - The full-text is not changed in any way - The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. - For more information please email researchsupport.lis@chester.ac.uk |