Ministry Patterns of Clergy Married to Clergy within an Ecosystem of Power in the Church of England
dc.contributor.author | Collingridge, Susan, R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-08T09:14:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-08T09:14:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Collingridge, S. (2019). Ministry Patterns of Clergy Married to Clergy within an Ecosystem of Power in the Church of England (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, UK. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10034/622939 | |
dc.description.abstract | There have been clergy married to clergy (CMC) in the Church of England for over thirty years yet their ministries are little understood and there is limited consistency of practice regarding CMC in the church. This work aims to address both problems. The thesis argues that CMC patterns of ministry are formed during their careers within an ecosystem of power: a complex network of elements and forces acting on and in reaction to each other. The CMC ecosystem of power is akin to ecosystems in nature. It includes dyadic dynamics and extends to family and local ministry contexts, diocese and wider church. CMC are subject to various types of power and can also exert influence. For this study 15 CMC individuals were interviewed from a range of dioceses, ministry contexts and life-stages. Each interview was structured by constructing a timeline of ministry/job changes and key personal and family events. The emerging picture of CMC patterns of ministry from qualitative interview data was enriched by quantitative data from participants’ timelines to illuminate factors influencing their ministry patterns. My research indicates that CMC experience the effect of the church’s authority in negative or positive ways, most emphatically during the early period of selection, initial training and curacy. CMC are doubly vulnerable to external constraints from the institution because both spouses are dependent on the church for work, home and income. Further constraints come from liabilities, responsibilities and expectations within family and wider social networks. CMC moderate their vulnerability through adhering to ‘independent’, ‘tangential’ or ‘integrated’ models of ministry. In the light of such choices they make decisions about applying for jobs, leaving posts and engaging in part-time or full-time, paid or unpaid, parish or non-parochial ministry. Within CMC ecosystems of power, support and competition influence how CMC ministries develop, notably within the CMC dyad (couple), the most distinctive feature of CMC ministry life. CMC spouses offer reciprocal support through understanding, practical and professional help, echoing the mutuality in natural ecosystems. CMC also decide whether one partner’s ministry has priority and which one takes precedence at different times. I argue that competition between CMC partners has the potential to create a positive outcome of growth and development for CMC by creating awareness of asymmetry and encouraging development of their personal and professional relationship. I make suggestions for future research and indicate limitations to this study. I propose recommendations for improved practice with CMC in the Church of England such as greater openness about diocesan policies and more consistent training for senior clergy. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Chester | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Ministry | en_US |
dc.subject | Dyad | en_US |
dc.subject | Dioceses | en_US |
dc.title | Ministry Patterns of Clergy Married to Clergy within an Ecosystem of Power in the Church of England | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis or dissertation | en_US |
dc.publisher.department | University of Chester | en_US |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2020-06-11 | |
dc.type.qualificationname | DProf | en_US |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Six month embargo | en_US |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.rights.usage | The full-text may be used and/or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes provided that: - A full bibliographic reference is made to the original source - A link is made to the metadata record in ChesterRep - The full-text is not changed in any way - The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. - For more information please email researchsupport.lis@chester.ac.uk |