• Login / Register
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Faculty of Health and Social Care
    • Health and Social Care
    • Health and Social Care
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Faculty of Health and Social Care
    • Health and Social Care
    • Health and Social Care
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChesterRepCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUniversity of Chester

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    A Whole Systems Approach to Hospital Waste Management in Rural Uganda

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    fpubh-07-00136.pdf
    Size:
    657.9Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Authors
    Kwikiriza, Stuart
    Stewart, Alex G.
    Mutahunga, Birungi
    Dobson, Andrew E.
    Wilkinson, Ewan
    Publication Date
    2019-06-06
    Submitted date
    2019-02-15
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Introduction: Safe waste management protects hospital staff, the public, and the local environment. The handling of hospital waste in Bwindi Community Hospital did not appear to conform to the hospital waste management plan, exhibiting poor waste segregation, transportation, storage, and disposal which could lead to environmental and occupational risks. Methods: We undertook a mixed-methods study. We used semi-structured interviews to assess the awareness of clinical and non-clinical staff of waste types, risks, good practice, and concerns about hospital waste management. We quantified waste production by five departments for 1 month. We assessed the standard of practice in segregation, onsite transportation, use of personal protective equipment, onsite storage of solid waste, and disposal of compostable waste and chemicals. Results: Clinical staff had good awareness of waste (types, risk) overall, but the knowledge of non-clinical staff was much poorer. There was a general lack of insight into correct personal or departmental practice, resulting in incorrect segregation of clinical and compostable waste at source (>93% of time), and incorrect onsite transportation (94% of time). In 1 month the five departments produced 5,398 kg of hazardous and non-hazardous waste (12; 88%, respectively). Good practice included the correct use of sharps and vial boxes and keeping the clinical area clear of litter (90% of the time); placentae buried immediately (>80% of the time); gloves were worn everyday by waste handlers, but correct heavy-duty gloves <33% of the time, reflecting the variable use of other personal protective equipment. Chemical waste drained to underground soakaways, but tracking further disposal was not possible. Correct segregation of clinical and compostable waste at source, and correct onsite transportation, only occurred 6% of the time. Conclusion: Waste management was generally below the required WHO standards. This exposes people and the wider environment, including the nearby world heritage site, home to the endangered mountain gorilla, to unnecessary risks. It is likely that the same is true in similar situations elsewhere. Precautions, protection, and dynamic policy making should be prioritized in these hospital settings and developing countries.
    Citation
    Frontiers in Public Health, volume 7, page 136
    Publisher
    Frontiers Media S.A.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10034/622361
    Type
    article
    Description
    From Frontiers via Jisc Publications Router
    History: collection 2019, received 2019-02-15, accepted 2019-05-13, epub 2019-06-06
    Publication status: Published
    Collections
    Health and Social Care

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.