Cognitive Influences shaping Grade Decision Making
dc.contributor.author | Pownall, Ian | * |
dc.contributor.author | Kennedy, Victoria | * |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-07T08:26:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-07T08:26:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-04-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pownall, I., & Kennedy, V. (2018). Cognitive Influences Shaping Grade Decision Making. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(2), 166-178 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0968-4883 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/QAE-04-2018-0040 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10034/621251 | |
dc.description.abstract | Whilst the marking process is a well explored area, there is limited analysis of the influences that shape the intention grading decision at the point at which it is made. This can be particularly important when those influences may vary during the marking process making reflective analyses also difficult to explore. We draw upon a small sample of assessed scripts from two UK HEIs and undertake a factor analysis of potentially important influences that shape the grading decision at the cognitive point it is made. Our findings indicate that for the sample analysed, the markers most important influences were those associated with the normative view of marking although they also suggest potential influences from when the script was graded and the fatigue of the marker concerned. Our findings indicate that for the sample analysed, the markers most important influences were those associated with the normative view of marking although they also suggest potential influences from when the script was graded and the fatigue of the marker concerned. The work is confined to undergraduate management students and limited by the sample size.A factor analysis reveals the cluster of influences that contribute to observed grade outcomes, but provides less clarity upon relative interdependencies between those factors.There are additional constraints in that the constructed data collection tool was self administered. The data collection instrument (VBA Excel workbook) is we believe, quite innovative in capturing immediate cognitive reflections. It could be developed for other decision making research. We also believe there are staff developmental outcomes from the work, to sustain and enhance assurance in the grading process. As far as we can determine, research that has explored the influences shaping grading and mark allocation tends to be reflective or after the event. Our research data is constructed at the same time as the grade / mark is determined. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Emerald | |
dc.relation.url | https://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/qae | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en |
dc.subject | cognitive heuristics | |
dc.subject | Theory of planned behaviour | |
dc.subject | Marking | |
dc.title | Cognitive Influences shaping Grade Decision Making | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | University of Chester; Liverpool Hope University | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Quality Assurance in Education | en |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-13 | |
or.grant.openaccess | Yes | en |
rioxxterms.funder | NA | en_US |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | unfunded | en_US |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_US |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-04-01 |