Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHutchby, Ian*
dc.contributor.authorO'Reilly, Michelle*
dc.contributor.authorParker, Nicola*
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-21T14:13:22Z
dc.date.available2018-03-21T14:13:22Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-01
dc.identifier.citationHutchby, I., O'Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2012). Ethics in Praxis: Negotiating the Role and Functions of a Video Camera in Family Therapy. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 675-690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612457487en
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1461445612457487
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/621002
dc.descriptionHutchby, I., O'Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2013). Ethics in Praxis: Negotiating the Role and Functions of a Video Camera in Family Therapy. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 675-690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612457487 . Copyright © 2012 SAGE. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.en
dc.description.abstractThe use of video for research purposes is something that has attracted ethical attention and debate. While the usefulness of video as a mechanism to collect data is widely agreed, the ethical sensitivity and impact of recording equipment is more contentious. In some clinical settings the presence of a camera has a dual role, as a portal to a reflecting team and as a recording device to obtain research data. Using data from one such setting, family therapy sessions, this article shows how the role played by recording equipment is negotiated in the course of talk and other activities that constitute sessions. Analysis reveals that members of the therapy interaction orient in different ways and for different purposes to the value of recordings. The article concludes that there are layers of benefit to be derived from recording of clinical interactions, including for members themselves, and this has wider implications for the ways in which qualitative research designs in health sciences are evaluated.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445612457487en
dc.subjectPraxiologyen
dc.subjectVideo recordingen
dc.subjectQualitative health research, research ethics, therapeutic discourseen
dc.titleEthics in Praxis: Negotiating the Role and Functions of a Video Camera in family therapyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.eissn1461-7080
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Leicesteren
dc.identifier.journalDiscourse Studiesen
dc.internal.reviewer-noteE-mailed Nikki to confirm version 9/3/18en
dc.date.accepted2012-09-01
or.grant.openaccessYesen
rioxxterms.funderUnfundeden
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUnfundeden
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2012-12-01
html.description.abstractThe use of video for research purposes is something that has attracted ethical attention and debate. While the usefulness of video as a mechanism to collect data is widely agreed, the ethical sensitivity and impact of recording equipment is more contentious. In some clinical settings the presence of a camera has a dual role, as a portal to a reflecting team and as a recording device to obtain research data. Using data from one such setting, family therapy sessions, this article shows how the role played by recording equipment is negotiated in the course of talk and other activities that constitute sessions. Analysis reveals that members of the therapy interaction orient in different ways and for different purposes to the value of recordings. The article concludes that there are layers of benefit to be derived from recording of clinical interactions, including for members themselves, and this has wider implications for the ways in which qualitative research designs in health sciences are evaluated.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ethics in Praxis - clinical ...
Size:
387.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record