Misperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exercise

Eston, Roger; Coquart, J.; Lamb, Kevin L.; Parfitt, Gaynor

dc.contributor.author	Eston, Roger	*
dc.contributor.author	Coquart, J.	*
dc.contributor.author	Lamb, Kevin L.	*
dc.contributor.author	Parfitt, Gaynor	*
dc.date.accessioned	2017-12-07T11:04:33Z
dc.date.available	2017-12-07T11:04:33Z
dc.date.issued	2015-12-01
dc.identifier.citation	Eston, R., Coquart, J., Lamb, K., & Parfitt, G. (2015). Misperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47(12), 2676
dc.identifier.doi	10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10034/620747
dc.description	This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a published work that appeared in final form in Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748.
dc.description.abstract	Dear Editor-in-Chief, Shaykevich et al. (7) demonstrate the efficacy of auditory feedback anchored at 75% of age-predicted HRmax to regulate intensity (claimed as ‘‘moderate’’) during several 20-min bouts of cycling. Their technical approach is novel, but 76% HRmax is the upper limit of moderate intensity, so given the large error in age-predicted HRmax, it is unlikely that their exercise bandwidth was ‘‘moderate’’ for all participants. This is not our major concern, but it reveals one among other inaccuracies: the most serious include training, interpretation, and inferences relating to the RPE.
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.publisher	American College of Sports Medicine
dc.relation.url	http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/fulltext/2015/12000/Misperception___No_Evidence_to_Dismiss_RPE_as.24.aspx	en
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	en
dc.subject	RPE	en
dc.subject	Intensity regulation	en
dc.title	Misperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exercise	en
dc.type	Article	en
dc.contributor.department	University of South Australia; Universite´ de Rouen; University of Chester
dc.identifier.journal	Lippincott Williams & Wilkins	en
or.grant.openaccess	Yes	en
rioxxterms.funder	Unfunded	en
rioxxterms.identifier.project	Unfunded	en
rioxxterms.version	AM	en
rioxxterms.versionofrecord	https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748
html.description.abstract	Dear Editor-in-Chief, Shaykevich et al. (7) demonstrate the efficacy of auditory feedback anchored at 75% of age-predicted HRmax to regulate intensity (claimed as ‘‘moderate’’) during several 20-min bouts of cycling. Their technical approach is novel, but 76% HRmax is the upper limit of moderate intensity, so given the large error in age-predicted HRmax, it is unlikely that their exercise bandwidth was ‘‘moderate’’ for all participants. This is not our major concern, but it reveals one among other inaccuracies: the most serious include training, interpretation, and inferences relating to the RPE.
rioxxterms.publicationdate	2015-12-01
dc.dateAccepted	2015-12-01
dc.date.deposited	2017-12-07