Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEston, Roger*
dc.contributor.authorCoquart, J.*
dc.contributor.authorLamb, Kevin L.*
dc.contributor.authorParfitt, Gaynor*
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-07T11:04:33Z
dc.date.available2017-12-07T11:04:33Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-01
dc.identifier.citationEston, R., Coquart, J., Lamb, K., & Parfitt, G. (2015). Misperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47(12), 2676
dc.identifier.doi10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/620747
dc.descriptionThis document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a published work that appeared in final form in Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748.
dc.description.abstractDear Editor-in-Chief, Shaykevich et al. (7) demonstrate the efficacy of auditory feedback anchored at 75% of age-predicted HRmax to regulate intensity (claimed as ‘‘moderate’’) during several 20-min bouts of cycling. Their technical approach is novel, but 76% HRmax is the upper limit of moderate intensity, so given the large error in age-predicted HRmax, it is unlikely that their exercise bandwidth was ‘‘moderate’’ for all participants. This is not our major concern, but it reveals one among other inaccuracies: the most serious include training, interpretation, and inferences relating to the RPE.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican College of Sports Medicine
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/fulltext/2015/12000/Misperception___No_Evidence_to_Dismiss_RPE_as.24.aspxen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectRPEen
dc.subjectIntensity regulationen
dc.titleMisperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exerciseen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of South Australia; Universite´ de Rouen; University of Chester
dc.identifier.journalLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen
or.grant.openaccessYesen
rioxxterms.funderUnfundeden
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUnfundeden
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748
html.description.abstractDear Editor-in-Chief, Shaykevich et al. (7) demonstrate the efficacy of auditory feedback anchored at 75% of age-predicted HRmax to regulate intensity (claimed as ‘‘moderate’’) during several 20-min bouts of cycling. Their technical approach is novel, but 76% HRmax is the upper limit of moderate intensity, so given the large error in age-predicted HRmax, it is unlikely that their exercise bandwidth was ‘‘moderate’’ for all participants. This is not our major concern, but it reveals one among other inaccuracies: the most serious include training, interpretation, and inferences relating to the RPE.
rioxxterms.publicationdate2015-12-01
dc.dateAccepted2015-12-01
dc.date.deposited2017-12-07


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
MSSE Misperception letter (2).pdf
Size:
350.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Request:
Main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/