Misperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exercise
Name:
MSSE Misperception letter (2).pdf
Size:
350.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Main article
Affiliation
University of South Australia; Universite´ de Rouen; University of ChesterPublication Date
01/12/2015Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Dear Editor-in-Chief, Shaykevich et al. (7) demonstrate the efficacy of auditory feedback anchored at 75% of age-predicted HRmax to regulate intensity (claimed as ‘‘moderate’’) during several 20-min bouts of cycling. Their technical approach is novel, but 76% HRmax is the upper limit of moderate intensity, so given the large error in age-predicted HRmax, it is unlikely that their exercise bandwidth was ‘‘moderate’’ for all participants. This is not our major concern, but it reveals one among other inaccuracies: the most serious include training, interpretation, and inferences relating to the RPE.Citation
Eston, R., Coquart, J., Lamb, K., & Parfitt, G. (2015). Misperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47(12), 2676Publisher
American College of Sports MedicineJournal
Lippincott Williams & WilkinsAdditional Links
http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/fulltext/2015/12000/Misperception___No_Evidence_to_Dismiss_RPE_as.24.aspxType
ArticleLanguage
enDescription
This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a published work that appeared in final form in Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748.Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/