Theorising lifestyle drift in health promotion: explaining community and voluntary sector engagement practices in disadvantaged areas
Affiliation
University of Sheffield; Hedmark University College; University of ChesterPublication Date
2017-07-24
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The past two decades have seen an increasing role for the UK community and voluntary sector (CVS) in health promotion in disadvantaged areas, largely based on assumptions on the part of funders that CVS providers are better able to engage ‘hard-to-reach’ population groups in services than statutory providers. However, there is limited empirical research exploring CVS provider practices in this field. Using ethnographic data this paper examines the experiences of a network of CVS providers seeking to engage residents in health promoting community services in a disadvantaged region in the North of England. The paper shows how CVS providers engaged in apparently contradictory practices, fluctuating between an empathically informed response to complex resident circumstances and (in the context of meeting externally set targets) behavioural lifestyle approaches to health promotion. Drawing on concepts from figurational sociology, the paper explains how lifestyle drift occurs in health promotion as a result of the complex web of relations (with funders, commissioners and residents) in which CVS providers are embedded. Despite the fact that research has revealed the impact of targets on the work of the CVS before, this paper demonstrates more specifically the way in which monitoring processes within CVS contracts can draw providers into the neoliberal lifestyle discourse so prevalent in health promotion.Citation
Powell, K., Thurston, M., & Bloyce, D. (2017). Theorising lifestyle drift in health promotion: Explaining community and voluntary sector engagement practices in disadvantaged areas. Critical Public Health, 27(5), 554-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1356909Publisher
Taylor & FrancisJournal
Critical Public HealthAdditional Links
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09581596.2017.1356909Type
ArticleLanguage
enDescription
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Public Health (CCPH) on 24/7/2017, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1356909ISSN
0958-1596EISSN
1469-3682ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/09581596.2017.1356909
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/