Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomson, Edward*
dc.contributor.authorLamb, Kevin L.*
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-21T14:29:45Z
dc.date.available2016-12-21T14:29:45Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-01
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/620304/Main%20Document%20%28ChesterRep%29.pdf?sequence=13
dc.identifier.citationThomson, E., & Lamb, K. (2017). Reproducibility of the internal load and performance-based responses to simulated amateur boxing. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(12), 3396-3402. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001749
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000001749
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/620304
dc.descriptionThis is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Thomson, E., & Lamb, K. (2017). Reproducibility of the internal load and performance-based responses to simulated amateur boxing. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(12), 3396-3402. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001749
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to examine the reproducibility of the internal load and performance-based responses to repeated bouts of a three-round amateur boxing simulation protocol (BOXFIT). Twenty-eight amateur boxers completed two familiarisation trials before performing two complete trials of the BOXFIT, separated by 4-7 days. To characterise the internal load, mean (HRmean) and peak (HRpeak) heart rate, breath-by-breath oxygen uptake (V ̇O2), aerobic energy expenditure (EEaer), excess carbon dioxide production (CO2excess) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded throughout each round and blood lactate determined post-BOXFIT. Additionally, an indication of the performance-based demands of the BOXFIT was provided by a measure of acceleration of the punches thrown in each round. Analysis revealed there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between repeated trials in any round for all dependent measures. The typical error (coefficient variation %) for all but one marker of internal load (CO2excess) was 1.2 – 16.5% and reflected a consistency that was sufficient for the detection of moderate changes in variables owing to an intervention. The reproducibility of the punch accelerations was high (CV% range = 2.1 – 2.7%). In general, these findings suggest that the internal load and performance-based efforts recorded during the BOXFIT are reproducible and thereby offers practitioners a method by which meaningful changes impacting on performance could be identified.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/en
dc.subjectCombat sportsen
dc.subjectphysiological responsesen
dc.subjectreliabilityen
dc.titleReproducibility of the internal load and performance-based responses to simulated amateur boxingen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.eissn1533-4287en
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Chester
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Researchen
or.grant.openaccessYesen
rioxxterms.funderunfunded researchen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectunfunded researchen
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001749
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-12-01en
refterms.dateFCD2019-07-17T08:55:30Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2018-12-01T00:00:00Z
html.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to examine the reproducibility of the internal load and performance-based responses to repeated bouts of a three-round amateur boxing simulation protocol (BOXFIT). Twenty-eight amateur boxers completed two familiarisation trials before performing two complete trials of the BOXFIT, separated by 4-7 days. To characterise the internal load, mean (HRmean) and peak (HRpeak) heart rate, breath-by-breath oxygen uptake (V ̇O2), aerobic energy expenditure (EEaer), excess carbon dioxide production (CO2excess) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded throughout each round and blood lactate determined post-BOXFIT. Additionally, an indication of the performance-based demands of the BOXFIT was provided by a measure of acceleration of the punches thrown in each round. Analysis revealed there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between repeated trials in any round for all dependent measures. The typical error (coefficient variation %) for all but one marker of internal load (CO2excess) was 1.2 – 16.5% and reflected a consistency that was sufficient for the detection of moderate changes in variables owing to an intervention. The reproducibility of the punch accelerations was high (CV% range = 2.1 – 2.7%). In general, these findings suggest that the internal load and performance-based efforts recorded during the BOXFIT are reproducible and thereby offers practitioners a method by which meaningful changes impacting on performance could be identified.
rioxxterms.publicationdate2017-12-01
dc.dateAccepted2016-11-28
dc.date.deposited2016-12-21


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Main Document (ChesterRep).pdf
Size:
235.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Request:
Main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/