Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiller, Servel*
dc.contributor.authorFrance, Derek*
dc.contributor.authorWelsh, Katharine E.*
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-09T13:59:21Zen
dc.date.available2016-06-09T13:59:21Zen
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationMiller, S., France, D., & Welsh, K. (2015). Development of Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) activities and an evaluation of their impact on learning: Geoscience students’ perceptions. Belgeo [En ligne], 1, 1-20.en
dc.identifier.issn2294-9135en
dc.identifier.doi10.4000/belgeo.16386
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/612328en
dc.description.abstractRecently, the recognition of Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) tools in natural hazard management and disaster reduction has gained prominence. A successful CERC will ensure the relevant stakeholders are effective communicating with each other. This requires a clear plan and set of principles that enables the stakeholders to function effectively in a crisis. Students hoping to work in the emergency and natural hazard management field need to develop these skills. This paper outlines the development of a range of risk communicating activities including simulation exercises for undergraduate Geoscience students. Progress in the development of the students risk communication skill through the series of activities is tracked and evaluated. Results indicate that 87% of the students perceived their risk communication skills were good or excellent after undertaking the exercises compared to 26% before. This paper also evaluates the impact of the activities and if they motivated them to learn more about the subject as a whole. Students generally indicated that the exercises motivated them to learn more about natural hazard management and they felt that they have become better risk communicators. They also indicate that they gained a more in-depth understanding of the requirements of effective and timely communications should they need to develop a CERC strategy during a crisis.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNational Committee of Geography of Belgium, Société Royale Belge de Géographieen
dc.relation.urlhttp://belgeo.revues.org/16386en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCercen
dc.subjectRisk communicationen
dc.subjectGeoscience studentsen
dc.subjectNatural hazard managementen
dc.subjectSocial mediaen
dc.subjectSimulationen
dc.titleDevelopment of Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) activities and an Evaluation of their Impact on Learning: Geoscience students’ perceptions,en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Chesteren
dc.identifier.journalBelgeoen
dc.internal.reviewer-noteContacted publisher directly SM 18/04/2016en
or.grant.openaccessYesen
rioxxterms.funderUnfundeden
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUnfundeden
rioxxterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.16386
html.description.abstractRecently, the recognition of Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) tools in natural hazard management and disaster reduction has gained prominence. A successful CERC will ensure the relevant stakeholders are effective communicating with each other. This requires a clear plan and set of principles that enables the stakeholders to function effectively in a crisis. Students hoping to work in the emergency and natural hazard management field need to develop these skills. This paper outlines the development of a range of risk communicating activities including simulation exercises for undergraduate Geoscience students. Progress in the development of the students risk communication skill through the series of activities is tracked and evaluated. Results indicate that 87% of the students perceived their risk communication skills were good or excellent after undertaking the exercises compared to 26% before. This paper also evaluates the impact of the activities and if they motivated them to learn more about the subject as a whole. Students generally indicated that the exercises motivated them to learn more about natural hazard management and they felt that they have become better risk communicators. They also indicate that they gained a more in-depth understanding of the requirements of effective and timely communications should they need to develop a CERC strategy during a crisis.
dc.dateAccepted2015-11-01
dc.date.deposited2016-06-09


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
France et al. Cerc- Final-28-0 ...
Size:
1.128Mb
Format:
PDF
Request:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/