• Login / Register
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Social Sciences, Geography, Policing and Law
    • Psychology
    • Psychology
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Social Sciences, Geography, Policing and Law
    • Psychology
    • Psychology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of ChesterRepCommunitiesTitleAuthorsPublication DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsPublication DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUniversity of Chester

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Stakeholders’ perceptions of the benefit of introducing an Australian Intermediary System for vulnerable witnesses

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    PowellBowdenMattison14A&NZJC.docx
    Size:
    69.50Kb
    Format:
    Microsoft Word 2007
    DownloadPDF Variant
    Authors
    Powell, Martine B.
    Bowden, Phoebe
    Mattison, Michelle
    Affiliation
    Deakin University; Lancaster University
    Publication Date
    2014-08-14
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Vulnerable witnesses (e.g. children and adults with communication impairment) face many barriers to testifying and achieving justice when participating in the criminal justice system. To date, reforms have been implemented in Australia to address these, yet the barriers remain. Several other countries have implemented an intermediary scheme, whereby an independent third party assists vulnerable witnesses to understand the questions and processes encountered during interviews and trials, and helps witnesses to be understood. This study provides a qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ (N¼25 professionals) perceptions regarding the potential benefits of implementing an intermediary scheme in Australia. While all participants demonstrated an open-minded attitude to new reform in this area, their perspectives did not support the introduction of an intermediary scheme at this time. Stakeholders highlighted the need for improved use and effectiveness of current measures, and expressed concern about adding further complication to the system.
    Citation
    Powell, M. B., Bowden, P., & Mattison, M. L. (2014). Stakeholders' perceptions of the benefit of introducing an Australian intermediary system for vulnerable witnesses. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48(4), 498-512. DOI: 10.1177/0004865814543391
    Publisher
    SAGE Publications
    Journal
    Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10034/604953
    DOI
    10.1177/0004865814543391
    Additional Links
    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0004865814543391
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    EISSN
    1837-9273
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1177/0004865814543391
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Psychology

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.