Stakeholders’ perceptions of the benefit of introducing an Australian Intermediary System for vulnerable witnesses
Name:
PowellBowdenMattison14A&NZJC.docx
Size:
69.50Kb
Format:
Microsoft Word 2007
Affiliation
Deakin University; Lancaster UniversityPublication Date
2014-08-14
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Vulnerable witnesses (e.g. children and adults with communication impairment) face many barriers to testifying and achieving justice when participating in the criminal justice system. To date, reforms have been implemented in Australia to address these, yet the barriers remain. Several other countries have implemented an intermediary scheme, whereby an independent third party assists vulnerable witnesses to understand the questions and processes encountered during interviews and trials, and helps witnesses to be understood. This study provides a qualitative analysis of stakeholders’ (N¼25 professionals) perceptions regarding the potential benefits of implementing an intermediary scheme in Australia. While all participants demonstrated an open-minded attitude to new reform in this area, their perspectives did not support the introduction of an intermediary scheme at this time. Stakeholders highlighted the need for improved use and effectiveness of current measures, and expressed concern about adding further complication to the system.Citation
Powell, M. B., Bowden, P., & Mattison, M. L. (2014). Stakeholders' perceptions of the benefit of introducing an Australian intermediary system for vulnerable witnesses. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48(4), 498-512. DOI: 10.1177/0004865814543391Publisher
SAGE PublicationsAdditional Links
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0004865814543391Type
ArticleLanguage
enEISSN
1837-9273ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1177/0004865814543391