Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMorehen, James C.*
dc.contributor.authorBradley, Warren J.*
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Jon*
dc.contributor.authorTwist, Craig*
dc.contributor.authorHambly, Catherine*
dc.contributor.authorSpeakman, John R.*
dc.contributor.authorMorton, James P.*
dc.contributor.authorClose, Graeme L.*
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-24T14:15:58Z
dc.date.available2016-03-24T14:15:58Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-31
dc.identifierhttps://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10034/603636/DLW%20Paper%20Post%20Reviewer%20Comments%2029th%20Jan%202016.pdf?sequence=9
dc.identifier.citationMorehen, J. C., Bradley, W. J., Clarke, J., Twist, C., Hambly, C., Speakman, J. R., . . . Close, G. L. (2016). The Assessment of Total Energy Expenditure During a 14-Day In-Season Period of Professional Rugby League Players Using the Doubly Labelled Water Method. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 26(5), 464-472. doi: doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0335
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0335
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/603636
dc.descriptionAs accepted for publication.
dc.description.abstractRugby League is a high-intensity collision sport competed over 80-minutes. Training loads are monitored to maximise recovery and assist in the design of nutritional strategies although no data are available on the Total Energy Expenditure (TEE) of players. We therefore assessed Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR) and TEE in six Super-League players over two consecutive weeks in-season including one-game per week. Fasted RMR was assessed followed by a baseline urine sample before oral administration of a bolus dose of hydrogen (deuterium 2H) and oxygen (18O) stable isotopes in the form of water (2H218O). Every 24 hours thereafter, players provided urine for analysis of TEE via DLW method. Individual training-load was quantified using session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) and data were analysed using magnitude-based inferences. There were unclear differences in RMR between forwards and backs (7.7 ± 0.5 cf. 8.0 ± 0.3 MJ, respectively). Indirect calorimetry produced RMR values most likely lower than predictive equations (7.9 ± 0.4 cf. 9.2 ± 0.4 MJ, respectively). A most likely increase in TEE from week-1 to -2 was observed (17.9 ± 2.1 cf. 24.2 ± 3.4 MJ) explained by a most likely increase in weekly sRPE (432 ± 19 cf. 555 ± 22 AU), respectively. The difference in TEE between forwards and backs was unclear (21.6 ± 4.2 cf. 20.5 ± 4.9 MJ, respectively). We report greater TEE than previously reported in rugby that could be explained by the ability of DLW to account for all match and training-related activities that contributes to TEE.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.humankinetics.com/IJSNEMen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectnutritionen
dc.subjectMetabolismen
dc.titleThe assessment of total energy expenditure during a 14-day ‘in-season’ period of professional rugby league players using the Doubly Labelled Water methoden
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.eissn1543-2742en
dc.contributor.departmentLiverpool John Moores University; Widnes Vikings Rugby League; University of Chester; University of Aberdeen
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Sports Nutrition and Exercise Metabolismen
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0335
html.description.abstractRugby League is a high-intensity collision sport competed over 80-minutes. Training loads are monitored to maximise recovery and assist in the design of nutritional strategies although no data are available on the Total Energy Expenditure (TEE) of players. We therefore assessed Resting Metabolic Rate (RMR) and TEE in six Super-League players over two consecutive weeks in-season including one-game per week. Fasted RMR was assessed followed by a baseline urine sample before oral administration of a bolus dose of hydrogen (deuterium 2H) and oxygen (18O) stable isotopes in the form of water (2H218O). Every 24 hours thereafter, players provided urine for analysis of TEE via DLW method. Individual training-load was quantified using session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) and data were analysed using magnitude-based inferences. There were unclear differences in RMR between forwards and backs (7.7 ± 0.5 cf. 8.0 ± 0.3 MJ, respectively). Indirect calorimetry produced RMR values most likely lower than predictive equations (7.9 ± 0.4 cf. 9.2 ± 0.4 MJ, respectively). A most likely increase in TEE from week-1 to -2 was observed (17.9 ± 2.1 cf. 24.2 ± 3.4 MJ) explained by a most likely increase in weekly sRPE (432 ± 19 cf. 555 ± 22 AU), respectively. The difference in TEE between forwards and backs was unclear (21.6 ± 4.2 cf. 20.5 ± 4.9 MJ, respectively). We report greater TEE than previously reported in rugby that could be explained by the ability of DLW to account for all match and training-related activities that contributes to TEE.
rioxxterms.publicationdate2016-10-31


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
DLW Paper Post Reviewer Comments ...
Size:
306.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Request:
Main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/