Bridging the gap: an exploration of the use and impact of positive action in the UK
Abstract
Despite laws in Britain permitting limited positive action initiatives to combat disadvantage faced by minority groups in employment since the mid-1970s, the subject has notoriously been a neglected and highly controversial area in the UK. Notwithstanding the potential provided by sections 158 and 159 of the Equality Act 2010, it still appears that organisations prefer to steer clear of this opportunity to address disadvantage suffered by protected groups. Whilst there is a body of work considering the theoretical importance of positive action in the UK, there is a lack of empirical exploration of the practical implications of these provisions. This paper will provide a brief overview of the theoretical context and current positive action legislative provisions within the UK. In light of this context, the early findings of a small-scale qualitative study carried out by the authors will be discussed looking at the experiences of a purposive sample of public and private employers in relation to the positive action provisions of the Equality Act 2010. Early research findings suggest that whilst there was a clear willingness and openness by employers to use of outreach measures in order to redress disadvantage, there was evident wariness regarding a move towards preferential treatment as expounded by section 159. Whilst respondents appeared to appreciate the business case for and utility of the positive action measures under section 158, there was far less enthusiasm for more direct preferential treatment, with many respondents raising serious concerns regarding this. These concerns often reflected a highly sensitive risk-based approach towards any action that could expose their organisation to the possibility of “reverse discrimination”.Citation
Davies, C. M., & Robison, M. (2016). Bridging the gap: An exploration of the use and impact of positive action in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 16(2-3), 83-101. doi: 10.1177/1358229116655647Publisher
SageAdditional Links
http://jdi.sagepub.com/Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1358-2291EISSN
2047-9468ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1177/1358229116655647
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: