Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWall, Tony*
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-28T16:12:27Z
dc.date.available2015-05-28T16:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2010-10-25
dc.identifier.citationUnpublished conference paper given as part of an electronic symposium about the Leonardo project Recognition of Prior Learning Outcomes (RPLO), 25 October 2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/555981
dc.descriptionThis conference paper is not available through ChesterRep.
dc.description.abstractThis paper captures and presents some of the powerful and sometimes contradictory discourses, which limit the diffusion and uptake of the recognition of prior learning outcomes (RPLO) in higher education: quality, funding, capacity, and student experience. Each of these is analysed and ‘opened up’ (Derrida, 1978; Bhabha, 1994). In doing so, it aims to ‘open up’ some of those discourses for practitioners and/or leaders to initiate or develop policy and practice in institutions further afield (Kemmis, 2008). The data that forms the basis of this paper was generated through various action research projects in a UK University and multiple development events in the UK.
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Leonardo Project
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/194344.pdf
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.rplo.eu
dc.rightsAn error occurred on the license name.*
dc.rights.uriAn error occurred getting the license - uri.*
dc.subjectaccreditation
dc.subjectrecognition of prior learning outcomes
dc.subjectwork based learning
dc.titleEnabling and disabling discourses in promoting RPLO policy and practice in Higher Education
dc.typeConference Contribution
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Chesteren
html.description.abstractThis paper captures and presents some of the powerful and sometimes contradictory discourses, which limit the diffusion and uptake of the recognition of prior learning outcomes (RPLO) in higher education: quality, funding, capacity, and student experience. Each of these is analysed and ‘opened up’ (Derrida, 1978; Bhabha, 1994). In doing so, it aims to ‘open up’ some of those discourses for practitioners and/or leaders to initiate or develop policy and practice in institutions further afield (Kemmis, 2008). The data that forms the basis of this paper was generated through various action research projects in a UK University and multiple development events in the UK.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record