Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiper, Heather*
dc.contributor.authorGarratt, Dean*
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Bill*
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-06T09:14:56Z
dc.date.available2014-01-06T09:14:56Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-30
dc.identifier.citationSport, Education and Society, 2013, 18(5), pp. 583-598en
dc.identifier.issn1357-3322
dc.identifier.issn1470-1243
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13573322.2012.735653
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/310921
dc.descriptionThis article is not available throgh ChesterRep.en
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses recently completed research on ‘no touch’ sports coaching, by placing it in a broader social context which problematises the way child abuse and child protection (or safeguarding) are conceived and discussed in terms of policy and practice. It also provides a brief indicative summary of the research findings and offers a discussion of moral panic, risk society and worst case thinking, before drawing on Foucault's work on governmentality to offer an explanation of how the current situation arose.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cses20/current
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Sport, Education and Societyen
dc.subjectfear of touch
dc.subjectchild abuse
dc.subjectsafeguarding
dc.subjectrisk
dc.subjectmoral panic
dc.subjectsports coaching
dc.subjectphysical education
dc.subjectgovernmentality
dc.titleChild abuse, child protection, and defensive ‘touch’ in PE teaching and sports coaching
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentManchester Metropolitan University ; University of Chester ; Manchester Metropolitan Universityen
dc.identifier.journalSport, Education and Societyen
html.description.abstractThis article discusses recently completed research on ‘no touch’ sports coaching, by placing it in a broader social context which problematises the way child abuse and child protection (or safeguarding) are conceived and discussed in terms of policy and practice. It also provides a brief indicative summary of the research findings and offers a discussion of moral panic, risk society and worst case thinking, before drawing on Foucault's work on governmentality to offer an explanation of how the current situation arose.
dc.dateAccepted2012-09-19


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record