Child abuse, child protection, and defensive ‘touch’ in PE teaching and sports coaching
dc.contributor.author | Piper, Heather | * |
dc.contributor.author | Garratt, Dean | * |
dc.contributor.author | Taylor, Bill | * |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-06T09:14:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-06T09:14:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-10-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sport, Education and Society, 2013, 18(5), pp. 583-598 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1357-3322 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1470-1243 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13573322.2012.735653 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10034/310921 | |
dc.description | This article is not available throgh ChesterRep. | en |
dc.description.abstract | This article discusses recently completed research on ‘no touch’ sports coaching, by placing it in a broader social context which problematises the way child abuse and child protection (or safeguarding) are conceived and discussed in terms of policy and practice. It also provides a brief indicative summary of the research findings and offers a discussion of moral panic, risk society and worst case thinking, before drawing on Foucault's work on governmentality to offer an explanation of how the current situation arose. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
dc.relation.url | http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cses20/current | |
dc.rights | Archived with thanks to Sport, Education and Society | en |
dc.subject | fear of touch | |
dc.subject | child abuse | |
dc.subject | safeguarding | |
dc.subject | risk | |
dc.subject | moral panic | |
dc.subject | sports coaching | |
dc.subject | physical education | |
dc.subject | governmentality | |
dc.title | Child abuse, child protection, and defensive ‘touch’ in PE teaching and sports coaching | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | Manchester Metropolitan University ; University of Chester ; Manchester Metropolitan University | en |
dc.identifier.journal | Sport, Education and Society | en |
html.description.abstract | This article discusses recently completed research on ‘no touch’ sports coaching, by placing it in a broader social context which problematises the way child abuse and child protection (or safeguarding) are conceived and discussed in terms of policy and practice. It also provides a brief indicative summary of the research findings and offers a discussion of moral panic, risk society and worst case thinking, before drawing on Foucault's work on governmentality to offer an explanation of how the current situation arose. | |
dc.dateAccepted | 2012-09-19 |