Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGraham, Elaine*
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-06T11:47:06Z
dc.date.available2013-12-06T11:47:06Z
dc.date.issued2013-08-06
dc.identifier.citationGraham, E. L. (2013). Is practical theology a form of ‘action research’? International Journal of Practical Theology, 17(1), 148-178.en
dc.identifier.issn1430-6921
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/ijpt-2013-0010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/306400
dc.descriptionThis is the published PDF version of an article published in International Journal of Practical Theology© 2013. The definitive version is available at www.degruyter.com/view/j/ijpt-2013-17-issue-1en
dc.description.abstractThis journal articles examines in depth the claim that practical theology ought to be regarded as a form of action research. Action research is founded on the indivisibility of value and action: a conviction that knowledge, and research, cannot be dispassionate and that values are themselves iterated in the process of their implementation in practice. It insists on the inductive and contextual nature of knowledge and assumes that knowledge comes from human experience (albeit interpreted and codified through rational enquiry and analysis), rather than proceeding deductively from revealed truth.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ijpten
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to International Journal of practical Theologyen
dc.subjectaction researchen
dc.subjecthuman experienceen
dc.subjectpractical theologyen
dc.titleIs practical theology a form of ‘action research’?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.eissn1612-9768
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Chesteren
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Practical Theologyen
html.description.abstractThis journal articles examines in depth the claim that practical theology ought to be regarded as a form of action research. Action research is founded on the indivisibility of value and action: a conviction that knowledge, and research, cannot be dispassionate and that values are themselves iterated in the process of their implementation in practice. It insists on the inductive and contextual nature of knowledge and assumes that knowledge comes from human experience (albeit interpreted and codified through rational enquiry and analysis), rather than proceeding deductively from revealed truth.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
graham - ijpt-2013.pdf
Size:
708.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Request:
article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record