Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLamb, Kevin L.*
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-03T10:24:12Z
dc.date.available2008-06-03T10:24:12Z
dc.date.issued1998-10
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Physical Education Review, 1998, 4, pp. 145-152.
dc.identifier.issn1356-336Xen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1356336X9800400205
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/29375
dc.descriptionThis is the author's PDF version of an article published in European Physical Education Review ©1998. The definitive version is available at http://epe.sagepub.com.
dc.description.abstractThis paper highlights an important statistical development for exercise and physical education research. Traditionally, the Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients have been liberally used by researchers to quantify the test-retest reliability of many performance, behavioural, and physiologically-related measurements. The suitability of these forms of analyses has recently been challenged by British exercise scientists, who argue that they do not really address what they are meant to, that is, the level of agreement between repeated measurements or scores. As a consequence, our existing knowledge of the reliability of such measurements is questionable and deserves to be re-established with a more appropriate statistical technique. Accordingly, the 95% Limits of Agreement method is presented and offered as an essential supplement for future measurement and evaluation research.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSage
dc.relation.urlhttp://epe.sagepub.com.en
dc.subjecttest-retest reliabilityen
dc.subjectlimits of agreementen
dc.titleTest-retest reliability in quantitative physical education research: A commentaryen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentChester College of Higher Education
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Physical Education Reviewen
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-14T00:46:01Z
html.description.abstractThis paper highlights an important statistical development for exercise and physical education research. Traditionally, the Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients have been liberally used by researchers to quantify the test-retest reliability of many performance, behavioural, and physiologically-related measurements. The suitability of these forms of analyses has recently been challenged by British exercise scientists, who argue that they do not really address what they are meant to, that is, the level of agreement between repeated measurements or scores. As a consequence, our existing knowledge of the reliability of such measurements is questionable and deserves to be re-established with a more appropriate statistical technique. Accordingly, the 95% Limits of Agreement method is presented and offered as an essential supplement for future measurement and evaluation research.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
ChesterRep EPER Reliability ...
Size:
108.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record