The trident: A three-pronged method for evaluating clinical, social and educational innovations

Authors
Ellis, Roger
Hogard, Elaine
Affiliation
University of Chester
Publication Date
2006-07-01

Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This article describes a distinctive approach to programme evalution used in over forty funded evaluations in the Social and Health Evaluation Unit at the University of Chester. It categories the questions asked by evaluators into three main groups: those concerned with outcomes and impact; those concerned with process; and those representing the views of the stakeholders involved in the programme.
Citation
Evaluation, 2006, 12(3), pp. 372-383
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Journal
Evaluation
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/227592
DOI
10.1177/1356389006069140
Additional Links
http://evi.sagepub.com
Type
Article
Language
en
Description
This article is not available through ChesterRep.
ISSN
1356-3890
Sponsors
This article was submitted to the RAE2008 for the University of Chester - Social Work and Social Policy & Administration.
Collections