The trident: A three-pronged method for evaluating clinical, social and educational innovations
AffiliationUniversity of Chester
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThis article describes a distinctive approach to programme evalution used in over forty funded evaluations in the Social and Health Evaluation Unit at the University of Chester. It categories the questions asked by evaluators into three main groups: those concerned with outcomes and impact; those concerned with process; and those representing the views of the stakeholders involved in the programme.
CitationEvaluation, 2006, 12(3), pp. 372-383
DescriptionThis article is not available through ChesterRep.
SponsorsThis article was submitted to the RAE2008 for the University of Chester - Social Work and Social Policy & Administration.