Loading...
Randomized Clinical Trial for the Optimization of Dyslipidemia Management in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing In-Hospital Maintenance Hemodialysis Therapy
Rehman, Sadia ; Farhan, Muhammad ; Sarfraz, Muhammad Raza ; Naveed, Asma ; Usman, Fahad ; Bibi, Anila ; Ahmed, Raheel ; Huq, Hiya ; Hasan, Ali ; Anzoom, Jarin ... show 1 more
Rehman, Sadia
Farhan, Muhammad
Sarfraz, Muhammad Raza
Naveed, Asma
Usman, Fahad
Bibi, Anila
Ahmed, Raheel
Huq, Hiya
Hasan, Ali
Anzoom, Jarin
Citations
Altmetric:
Advisors
Editors
Other Contributors
EPub Date
Publication Date
2025-08-28
Submitted Date
2025-06-22
Collections
Files
Loading...
Article - VoR
Adobe PDF, 2.37 MB
Other Titles
Abstract
Background/Objectives: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) frequently develop L-carnitine (LC) deficiency, leading to dyslipidemia and increased cardiovascular risk. While LC supplementation may improve dyslipidemia, the optimal route of administration remains unclear. This study evaluates the effects of LC on dyslipidemia in MHD patients and compares oral versus intravenous (IV) administration. Methods: In this dual-center randomized controlled trial (NCT05817799), 102 MHD patients aged 18–50 years were randomized to receive either oral (500 mg thrice daily) or IV LC (20 mg/kg post-dialysis thrice weekly for 23 weeks followed by 500 mg oral daily for 1 week) for 24 weeks, and blood samples were obtained to evaluate lipid profile parameters. Results: Eighty-three patients completed the study (oral n = 49, IV n = 34). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in all lipid parameters (p < 0.0001). In the oral group, total cholesterol (TC) demonstrated a mean reduction of 15.04 ± 8.52, triglycerides (TG) decreased by 14.84 ± 13.20, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) declined by 9.87 ± 8.74, with a rise in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) of 5.34 ± 4.33. In contrast, the IV group showed greater improvement, with TC being reduced by 17.62 ± 8.98, TG reduced by 19.21 ± 11.33, and HDL-C elevated by 7.26 ± 4.35. Group comparison revealed significantly greater LDL reduction in the IV group (71.91 ± 14.37 mg/dL) versus oral group (79.04 ± 14.92 mg/dL, p = 0.03), whereas TC, TG, and HDL changes showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Both oral and IV interventions effectively improved lipid profiles, and IV administration showed a more pronounced effect on LDL reduction, suggesting potentially greater efficacy of IV administration for LDL reduction.
Citation
Rehman, S., Farhan, M., Sarfraz, M. R., Naveed, A., Usman, F., Bibi, A., Ahmed, R., Huq, H., Hasan, A., Anzoom, J., & Kumar, P. (2025). Randomized Clinical Trial for the Optimization of Dyslipidemia Management in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing In-Hospital Maintenance Hemodialysis Therapy. Pharmaceutics. 17(9), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091128
Publisher
MDPI
Journal
Pharmaceutics
Research Unit
PubMed ID
PubMed Central ID
Type
Article
Language
Description
Series/Report no.
ISSN
1999-4923
EISSN
ISBN
ISMN
Gov't Doc
Test Link
Sponsors
N/A
