Misperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exercise

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/620747
Title:
Misperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exercise
Authors:
Eston, Roger; Coquart, J.; Lamb, Kevin L.; Parfitt, Gaynor
Abstract:
Dear Editor-in-Chief, Shaykevich et al. (7) demonstrate the efficacy of auditory feedback anchored at 75% of age-predicted HRmax to regulate intensity (claimed as ‘‘moderate’’) during several 20-min bouts of cycling. Their technical approach is novel, but 76% HRmax is the upper limit of moderate intensity, so given the large error in age-predicted HRmax, it is unlikely that their exercise bandwidth was ‘‘moderate’’ for all participants. This is not our major concern, but it reveals one among other inaccuracies: the most serious include training, interpretation, and inferences relating to the RPE.
Affiliation:
University of South Australia; Universite´ de Rouen; University of Chester
Citation:
Eston, R., Coquart, J., Lamb, K., & Parfitt, G. (2015). Misperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47(12), 2676
Publisher:
American College of Sports Medicine
Journal:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Publication Date:
1-Dec-2015
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/620747
DOI:
10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748
Additional Links:
http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/fulltext/2015/12000/Misperception___No_Evidence_to_Dismiss_RPE_as.24.aspx
Type:
Article
Language:
en
Description:
This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a published work that appeared in final form in Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748.
Appears in Collections:
Sport and Exercise Sciences

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorEston, Rogeren
dc.contributor.authorCoquart, J.en
dc.contributor.authorLamb, Kevin L.en
dc.contributor.authorParfitt, Gaynoren
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-07T11:04:33Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-07T11:04:33Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationEston, R., Coquart, J., Lamb, K., & Parfitt, G. (2015). Misperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47(12), 2676en
dc.identifier.doi10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/620747-
dc.descriptionThis document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a published work that appeared in final form in Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000748.-
dc.description.abstractDear Editor-in-Chief, Shaykevich et al. (7) demonstrate the efficacy of auditory feedback anchored at 75% of age-predicted HRmax to regulate intensity (claimed as ‘‘moderate’’) during several 20-min bouts of cycling. Their technical approach is novel, but 76% HRmax is the upper limit of moderate intensity, so given the large error in age-predicted HRmax, it is unlikely that their exercise bandwidth was ‘‘moderate’’ for all participants. This is not our major concern, but it reveals one among other inaccuracies: the most serious include training, interpretation, and inferences relating to the RPE.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican College of Sports Medicineen
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/fulltext/2015/12000/Misperception___No_Evidence_to_Dismiss_RPE_as.24.aspxen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectRPEen
dc.subjectIntensity regulationen
dc.titleMisperception: No evidence to dismiss RPE as regulator of moderate-intensity exerciseen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of South Australia; Universite´ de Rouen; University of Chesteren
dc.identifier.journalLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen
dc.date.accepted2015-12-01-
or.grant.openaccessYesen
rioxxterms.funderUnfundeden
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUnfundeden
rioxxterms.versionAMen
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in ChesterRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.