Shifting the starting blocks: an exploration of the impact of positive action in the UK

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/600573
Title:
Shifting the starting blocks: an exploration of the impact of positive action in the UK
Authors:
Davies, Chantal ( 0000-0002-0532-7366 ) ; Robison, Muriel
Abstract:
Despite laws in Britain permitting limited positive action initiatives to combat disadvantage faced by minority groups in employment since the mid-1970s, the subject has notoriously been a neglected and highly controversial area in the UK. In 2010, the existing positive action provisions for the individual protected characteristics were to some extent transposed into the Equality Act 2010 (section 158 Equality Act 2010). Whilst the previous legislation had been based on an accepted ‘equality of opportunity’ approach, the new section 158 could be seen as a broadening out of positive action moving towards an ‘equality of results’ paradigm (Burrows & Robison, 2006). More recently, with the implementation of section 159 of the Equality Act 2010 in 2011, positive action in the UK has moved into new territory permitting organisations to utilise preferential treatment (using McCrudden’s taxonomy of positive action) in the form of ‘tie-break’ provision. Section 159 introduced a specific exemption for positive action in relation to recruitment and promotion. Where a particular protected group are at a disadvantage or are under-represented and there are two candidates ‘as qualified as’ each other, the employer is permitted to take a protected characteristic into consideration. Although sections 158 and 159 are voluntary provisions, it may be that the Public Sector Equality Duty could arguably require public bodies at least to have due regard to positive action initiatives pursuant to the section 149 obligation. Notwithstanding the potential provided by sections 158 and 159 of the Equality Act 2010, it still appears that organizations prefer to steer clear of this opportunity to address disadvantage suffered by protected groups. Nevertheless, the recent announcement of the Judicial Appointments Commission regarding their intention to use the ‘equal merit provision’ in recruitment exercises from 1 July 2014 in order to seek to ensure diversity within the judiciary is notable (Judicial Appointments Commission, 2014; Malleson, 2009). Equally, work carried out for ASLEF (Robison, 2012) has indicated that unions in male dominated sectors are seeking to encourage employers to engage with positive action initiatives. Whilst there is a body of work considering the theoretical importance of positive action in the UK (see inter alia Barmes, 2011; Burrows & Robison, 2006; Johns et al, 2014; McCrudden 1986; Noon, 2010), there is a lack of empirical exploration of the practical implications of these provisions. Qualitative study to determine the utility of the positive action provisions is considered both timely and necessary as we approach the fifth anniversary of the Equality Act 2010. This paper will explore the theoretical context of the current positive action provisions within England, Scotland and Wales. It will also discuss the early findings of a small-scale qualitative study carried out by the authors looking at the experiences of a purposive sample of public and private organisations in light of the potential for positive action in relation to employment in the UK.
Affiliation:
University of Chester
Citation:
Davies, C., & Robison, M. (2015). Shifting the starting blocks: an exploration of the impact of positive action in the UK. In Beyond 2015 shaping the future of equality human rights and social justice, EDF.
Publisher:
Equality and Diversity Forum
Publication Date:
Jun-2015
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/600573
Additional Links:
http://www.edf.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/EDF_Beyond_2015_PDF.pdf
Type:
Book chapter
Language:
en
Appears in Collections:
Law

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Chantalen
dc.contributor.authorRobison, Murielen
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-03T16:23:40Zen
dc.date.available2016-03-03T16:23:40Zen
dc.date.issued2015-06en
dc.identifier.citationDavies, C., & Robison, M. (2015). Shifting the starting blocks: an exploration of the impact of positive action in the UK. In Beyond 2015 shaping the future of equality human rights and social justice, EDF.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/600573en
dc.description.abstractDespite laws in Britain permitting limited positive action initiatives to combat disadvantage faced by minority groups in employment since the mid-1970s, the subject has notoriously been a neglected and highly controversial area in the UK. In 2010, the existing positive action provisions for the individual protected characteristics were to some extent transposed into the Equality Act 2010 (section 158 Equality Act 2010). Whilst the previous legislation had been based on an accepted ‘equality of opportunity’ approach, the new section 158 could be seen as a broadening out of positive action moving towards an ‘equality of results’ paradigm (Burrows & Robison, 2006). More recently, with the implementation of section 159 of the Equality Act 2010 in 2011, positive action in the UK has moved into new territory permitting organisations to utilise preferential treatment (using McCrudden’s taxonomy of positive action) in the form of ‘tie-break’ provision. Section 159 introduced a specific exemption for positive action in relation to recruitment and promotion. Where a particular protected group are at a disadvantage or are under-represented and there are two candidates ‘as qualified as’ each other, the employer is permitted to take a protected characteristic into consideration. Although sections 158 and 159 are voluntary provisions, it may be that the Public Sector Equality Duty could arguably require public bodies at least to have due regard to positive action initiatives pursuant to the section 149 obligation. Notwithstanding the potential provided by sections 158 and 159 of the Equality Act 2010, it still appears that organizations prefer to steer clear of this opportunity to address disadvantage suffered by protected groups. Nevertheless, the recent announcement of the Judicial Appointments Commission regarding their intention to use the ‘equal merit provision’ in recruitment exercises from 1 July 2014 in order to seek to ensure diversity within the judiciary is notable (Judicial Appointments Commission, 2014; Malleson, 2009). Equally, work carried out for ASLEF (Robison, 2012) has indicated that unions in male dominated sectors are seeking to encourage employers to engage with positive action initiatives. Whilst there is a body of work considering the theoretical importance of positive action in the UK (see inter alia Barmes, 2011; Burrows & Robison, 2006; Johns et al, 2014; McCrudden 1986; Noon, 2010), there is a lack of empirical exploration of the practical implications of these provisions. Qualitative study to determine the utility of the positive action provisions is considered both timely and necessary as we approach the fifth anniversary of the Equality Act 2010. This paper will explore the theoretical context of the current positive action provisions within England, Scotland and Wales. It will also discuss the early findings of a small-scale qualitative study carried out by the authors looking at the experiences of a purposive sample of public and private organisations in light of the potential for positive action in relation to employment in the UK.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEquality and Diversity Forumen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.edf.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/EDF_Beyond_2015_PDF.pdfen
dc.subjectequalityen
dc.subjectpositive actionen
dc.subjectEquality Act 2010en
dc.titleShifting the starting blocks: an exploration of the impact of positive action in the UKen
dc.typeBook chapteren
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Chesteren
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in ChesterRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.