Contrasting vertical and horizontal representations of affect in emotional visual search

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/560363
Title:
Contrasting vertical and horizontal representations of affect in emotional visual search
Authors:
Damjanovic, Ljubica; Santiago, Julio
Abstract:
Independent lines of evidence suggest that the representation of emotional evaluation recruits both vertical and horizontal spatial mappings. These two spatial mappings differ in their experiential origins and their productivity, and available data suggest that they differ in their saliency. Yet, no study has so far compared their relative strength in an attentional orienting reaction time task that affords the simultaneous manifestation of both of them. Here we investigated this question using a visual search task with emotional faces. We presented angry and happy face targets and neutral distracter faces in top, bottom, left, and right locations on the computer screen. Conceptual congruency effects were observed along the vertical dimension supporting the ‘up=good’ metaphor, but not along the horizontal dimension. This asymmetrical processing pattern was observed when faces were presented in a cropped (Experiment 1) and whole (Experiment 2) format. These findings suggest that the ‘up=good’ metaphor is more salient and readily activated than the ‘right=good’ metaphor, and that the former outcompetes the latter when the task context affords the simultaneous activation of both mappings.
Citation:
Damjanovic, L., & Santiago, J. (2015). Contrasting vertical and horizontal representations of affect in emotional visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1-12. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0884-6
Journal:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Publication Date:
2015
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/560363
Type:
Article
Description:
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3758/s13423-015-0884-6
ISSN:
1069-9384
Appears in Collections:
Psychology

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorDamjanovic, Ljubicaen
dc.contributor.authorSantiago, Julioen
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-14T10:00:51Zen
dc.date.available2015-07-14T10:00:51Zen
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationDamjanovic, L., & Santiago, J. (2015). Contrasting vertical and horizontal representations of affect in emotional visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1-12. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0884-6en
dc.identifier.issn1069-9384en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/560363en
dc.descriptionThe final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3758/s13423-015-0884-6en
dc.description.abstractIndependent lines of evidence suggest that the representation of emotional evaluation recruits both vertical and horizontal spatial mappings. These two spatial mappings differ in their experiential origins and their productivity, and available data suggest that they differ in their saliency. Yet, no study has so far compared their relative strength in an attentional orienting reaction time task that affords the simultaneous manifestation of both of them. Here we investigated this question using a visual search task with emotional faces. We presented angry and happy face targets and neutral distracter faces in top, bottom, left, and right locations on the computer screen. Conceptual congruency effects were observed along the vertical dimension supporting the ‘up=good’ metaphor, but not along the horizontal dimension. This asymmetrical processing pattern was observed when faces were presented in a cropped (Experiment 1) and whole (Experiment 2) format. These findings suggest that the ‘up=good’ metaphor is more salient and readily activated than the ‘right=good’ metaphor, and that the former outcompetes the latter when the task context affords the simultaneous activation of both mappings.en
dc.titleContrasting vertical and horizontal representations of affect in emotional visual searchen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalPsychonomic Bulletin & Reviewen
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in ChesterRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.