Interfaith dialogue and the significance of difference: Considering Legenhausen’s non-reductive pluralism as a basis for Muslim-Christian dialogue

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/338904
Title:
Interfaith dialogue and the significance of difference: Considering Legenhausen’s non-reductive pluralism as a basis for Muslim-Christian dialogue
Authors:
Pfaff, Anneke
Abstract:
This research focuses on theories of interreligious dialogue and Muslim-Christian dialogue specifically. The aim is to examine whether Legenhausen’s non-reductive religious pluralism, rooted in Shi’a theology, is a successful solution to the problem of difference involved in Hick’s (reductive) hypothesis. Such a study is important because it investigates what types of theories of interreligious relations are “difference-respecting” in the sense that they are capable of recognizing the significance of religious and cultural differences as invaluable resources for interfaith dialogue. The research approach adopted is a critical analysis of the relevant literature, undertaken from a philosophical/phenomenological perspective. The findings are that Legenhausen’s position does not solve the problem of difference to a satisfying degree because a) it is based on inclusivist thinking and thus faces the charge of spiritual superiority and b) by excusing differences between Muslim and Christian beliefs by reference to the concept of qasir (incapability), it does not take otherness seriously, which makes it even more reductive than classical pluralisms. The main conclusion is that a truly egalitarian account of religions, sensitive to issues of difference, needs to bridge the gulf between objective observer perspectives (adopted by pluralists) and insider views on interfaith issues (promoted by religiously specific approaches like Legenhausen’s). As an alternative theory it is therefore recommended to combine the best of both approaches into a (religiously non-specific) model of witnessing, based on minimal ethical pluralism.
Publisher:
University of Chester
Publication Date:
Sep-2014
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/338904
Type:
Thesis or dissertation
Language:
en
Appears in Collections:
Masters Dissertations

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorPfaff, Annekeen
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-27T13:20:28Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-27T13:20:28Z-
dc.date.issued2014-09-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/338904-
dc.description.abstractThis research focuses on theories of interreligious dialogue and Muslim-Christian dialogue specifically. The aim is to examine whether Legenhausen’s non-reductive religious pluralism, rooted in Shi’a theology, is a successful solution to the problem of difference involved in Hick’s (reductive) hypothesis. Such a study is important because it investigates what types of theories of interreligious relations are “difference-respecting” in the sense that they are capable of recognizing the significance of religious and cultural differences as invaluable resources for interfaith dialogue. The research approach adopted is a critical analysis of the relevant literature, undertaken from a philosophical/phenomenological perspective. The findings are that Legenhausen’s position does not solve the problem of difference to a satisfying degree because a) it is based on inclusivist thinking and thus faces the charge of spiritual superiority and b) by excusing differences between Muslim and Christian beliefs by reference to the concept of qasir (incapability), it does not take otherness seriously, which makes it even more reductive than classical pluralisms. The main conclusion is that a truly egalitarian account of religions, sensitive to issues of difference, needs to bridge the gulf between objective observer perspectives (adopted by pluralists) and insider views on interfaith issues (promoted by religiously specific approaches like Legenhausen’s). As an alternative theory it is therefore recommended to combine the best of both approaches into a (religiously non-specific) model of witnessing, based on minimal ethical pluralism.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Chesteren
dc.subjectinterreligious dialogueen
dc.subjectMuslim-Christian relationsen
dc.subjectreligious pluralismen
dc.subjectreligious differenceen
dc.subjectJohn Hicken
dc.subjectHajj Muhammad Legenhausenen
dc.titleInterfaith dialogue and the significance of difference: Considering Legenhausen’s non-reductive pluralism as a basis for Muslim-Christian dialogueen
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen
dc.type.qualificationnameMAen
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters Degreeen
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in ChesterRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.