Materialising meaning: Samuel Taylor Coleridge and George Eliot

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/269859
Title:
Materialising meaning: Samuel Taylor Coleridge and George Eliot
Authors:
Davis, Jenny L.
Abstract:
George Eliot’s response to Romantic ideology is critically established. While most scholarship recognises the influence of William Wordsworth on her prose fiction, the affinities between Eliot’s prose and the poetry of Samuel Taylor Coleridge remain relatively unexplored. A wealth of criticism has established Coleridge’s importance to nineteenth-century philosophical and religious thought, as well as to aesthetic discourse; critical discussion of his poetic influence is usually linked with contemporary and later poets. He is, however, often invoked as a major influence on Eliot’s intellectual development. Evidence of Coleridge’s direct influence on Eliot’s fiction is difficult to substantiate; this study offers readings that diverge from previous analyses by foregrounding Eliot’s engagement with Coleridge’s language. Focus on the language used by Coleridge and Eliot reveals thematic and linguistic similarities, as well as convergences in their use of metaphor and symbolism. Where divergences exist, they are examined with the objective of establishing a development or progression in the way ideas and concepts are expressed in Eliot’s fiction. The nature of this progression is analysed in terms of Eliot’s increased preoccupation with materiality.
Publisher:
University of Chester
Publication Date:
2012
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/269859
Type:
Thesis or dissertation
Language:
en
Appears in Collections:
Masters Dissertations

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Jenny L.en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-20T15:34:41Zen
dc.date.available2013-02-20T15:34:41Zen
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/269859en
dc.description.abstractGeorge Eliot’s response to Romantic ideology is critically established. While most scholarship recognises the influence of William Wordsworth on her prose fiction, the affinities between Eliot’s prose and the poetry of Samuel Taylor Coleridge remain relatively unexplored. A wealth of criticism has established Coleridge’s importance to nineteenth-century philosophical and religious thought, as well as to aesthetic discourse; critical discussion of his poetic influence is usually linked with contemporary and later poets. He is, however, often invoked as a major influence on Eliot’s intellectual development. Evidence of Coleridge’s direct influence on Eliot’s fiction is difficult to substantiate; this study offers readings that diverge from previous analyses by foregrounding Eliot’s engagement with Coleridge’s language. Focus on the language used by Coleridge and Eliot reveals thematic and linguistic similarities, as well as convergences in their use of metaphor and symbolism. Where divergences exist, they are examined with the objective of establishing a development or progression in the way ideas and concepts are expressed in Eliot’s fiction. The nature of this progression is analysed in terms of Eliot’s increased preoccupation with materiality.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Chesteren
dc.subjectSamuel Taylor Coleridgeen_GB
dc.subjectGeorge Elioten_GB
dc.subjectinfluenceen_GB
dc.titleMaterialising meaning: Samuel Taylor Coleridge and George Elioten_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen
dc.type.qualificationnameMAen
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters Degreeen
All Items in ChesterRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.