Search:
Browse
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

University of Chester Digital Repository > Academic Faculties > Faculty of Health and Social Care > Health and Social Care  > Effectiveness of cooling gel pads and ice packs on perineal pain

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10034/88513
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!



Title: Effectiveness of cooling gel pads and ice packs on perineal pain
Authors: Navviba, Shahin
Abedian, Zahra
Steen, Mary
Affiliation: Zahedan University of Medical Science Nursing & Midwifery, Mashhad Iran ; Faculty of Health & Social Care, University of Chester
Citation: British Journal of Midwifery, 17(11), pp. 724-729
Publisher: Mark Allen
Journal: British Journal of Midwifery
Issue Date: Nov-2009
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10034/88513
Additional Links: http://www.britishjournalofmidwifery.com/cgi-bin/go.pl/library/article.html?uid=45030;article=BJM_17_11_724_729
http://www.britishjournalofmidwifery.com
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of a randomised controlled trial undertaken at the Hazrat Ommolbanin University Maternity Hospital in Mashhad, Iran which investigated the effectiveness of localised cooling treatments to alleviate perineal trauma. From October 2005 to February 2006, 121 primiparous women who were at term and had an episiotomy were randomly recruited to one of three treatment groups (Group 1 - no localised cooling, Group 2 - Ice pack, Group 3 - cooling gel pad). The intensity of pain, wound healing and women’s satisfaction levels were the main outcomes measured. The intensity of pain was measured by a (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10) and wound healing was evaluated by the REEDA scale within 4 hours of episiotomy repair, at Day 1, Day 2, Day 5 and finally at Day 10. The usage of oral analgesia (acetaminophen) was measured at Day 10. Women’s satisfaction levels with oral analgesia and localised cooling treatments were also assessed at Day 10 by a NRS (0-10). There was evidence that localised cooling treatments are effective at alleviating perineal pain which was in favour of the cooling gel pad group. A statistical significant difference was reported at 4 hours (p=0.003) Day 2 (p=0.004) and at Day 10 (p=0.044). At Day 1 and Day 5 there was evidence of a reduction in the intensity of pain but this did not reach a statistical significant difference. A reduction in the usage of oral analgesia (acetaminophen) was reported in favour of the cooling gel pad group (p<0.001). Women’s satisfaction levels with oral analgesia were similar within the three treatment groups but a higher level of satisfaction when assessing localised treatment was reported by the cooling gel pad group (p<0.001). Wound healing rates were also reported to be better in the cooling gel pad group when compared to the other two groups(p<0.001). In conclusion, treatments to alleviate perineal pain without any adverse affects on wound healing and women’s views are important aspects of midwifery care. This trial has demonstrated evidence that localised cooling of the perineum reduces the intensity of pain, women were more satisfied when applying cooling gel pads and this treatment appeared to assist in wound healing.
Type: Article
Language: en
Description: This article is not available through ChesterRep.
Keywords: perineal pain
localised cooling
femepads
women's views
episiotomy
wound healing
ISSN: 0969-4900
Appears in Collections: Health and Social Care

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.



All Items in ChesterRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.