Philosophy, qualitative methodology and sports coaching research: An unlikely trinity?

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/310866
Title:
Philosophy, qualitative methodology and sports coaching research: An unlikely trinity?
Authors:
Garratt, Dean
Abstract:
This article presents a critical account of the relation and unlikely trinity of philosophy, qualitative methodology and sports coaching research, in order to challenge assumptions about the nature of qualitative data analysis. A more radical departure and critique from a philosophical-hermeneutic perspective is encouraged. The key argument presented is that qualitative data analysis should have less to do with ‘method’ and more with philosophy, where ‘practical reasoning’ forges a dialectical relation between the intellectual and practical in the analytical process. This argument is illustrated with reference to published empirical work in the field of sports coaching research.
Affiliation:
University of Chester
Citation:
Sports Coaching Review, 2013, 2(1), pp. 1-12
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Journal:
Sports Coaching Review
Issue Date:
2013
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/310866
DOI:
10.1080/21640629.2013.822152
Additional Links:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21640629.2013.822152
Type:
Article
Language:
en
Description:
This article is not available through ChesterRep.
ISSN:
2164-0629; 2164-0637
Appears in Collections:
Education

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGarratt, Deanen
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-03T14:13:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-03T14:13:01Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationSports Coaching Review, 2013, 2(1), pp. 1-12en
dc.identifier.issn2164-0629-
dc.identifier.issn2164-0637-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21640629.2013.822152-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10034/310866-
dc.descriptionThis article is not available through ChesterRep.en
dc.description.abstractThis article presents a critical account of the relation and unlikely trinity of philosophy, qualitative methodology and sports coaching research, in order to challenge assumptions about the nature of qualitative data analysis. A more radical departure and critique from a philosophical-hermeneutic perspective is encouraged. The key argument presented is that qualitative data analysis should have less to do with ‘method’ and more with philosophy, where ‘practical reasoning’ forges a dialectical relation between the intellectual and practical in the analytical process. This argument is illustrated with reference to published empirical work in the field of sports coaching research.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21640629.2013.822152en
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Sports Coaching Reviewen
dc.subjectphilosophyen
dc.subjectmethodologyen
dc.subjecthermeneuticsen
dc.subjectsports coachingen
dc.titlePhilosophy, qualitative methodology and sports coaching research: An unlikely trinity?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Chesteren
dc.identifier.journalSports Coaching Reviewen
All Items in ChesterRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.