|
University of Chester Digital Repository >
Academic Faculties >
Faculty of Health and Social Care >
Social and Health Evaluation Unit >
The trident: A three-pronged method for evaluating clinical, social and educational innovations
Please use
this identifier to cite or link
to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10034/227592
 Del.icio.us
 LinkedIn
 Citeulike
 Connotea
 Facebook
 Stumble it!
| Title: | The trident: A three-pronged method for evaluating clinical, social and educational innovations |
| Authors: | Ellis, Roger
Hogard, Elaine |
| Affiliation: | University of Chester |
| Citation: | Evaluation, 2006, 12(3), pp. 372-383 |
| Publisher: | SAGE |
| Journal: | Evaluation |
| Issue Date: | Jul-2006 |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10034/227592 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/1356389006069140 |
| Additional Links: | http://evi.sagepub.com |
| Abstract: | This article describes a distinctive approach to programme evalution used in over forty funded evaluations in the Social and Health Evaluation Unit at the University of Chester. It categories the questions asked by evaluators into three main groups: those concerned with outcomes and impact; those concerned with process; and those representing the views of the stakeholders involved in the programme. |
| Type: | Article |
| Language: | en |
| Description: | This article is not available through ChesterRep. |
| Keywords: | programme evaluation |
| ISSN: | 13563890 |
|
| Appears in Collections: | Social and Health Evaluation Unit
Health and Social Care
|
| Files in This Item: |
There are no files associated with this item. |
|
All Items in ChesterRep are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|
