http://hdl.handle.net/10034/6399 Sat, 18 May 2013 17:38:08 GMT 2013-05-18T17:38:08Z http://hdl.handle.net/10034/265286 Title: PDP in the curriculum - how far have we come? Authors: Done, Judith Abstract: This presentation discusses the extent to which the University of Chester's revised academic framework will raise the profile of personal development portfolios and career development learning. The potential impact on the student experience will also be explored. Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/10034/265286 2007-06-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10034/263411 Title: Examining the workings of a late nineteenth century provincial press conglomerate: Frederick Edward Roe and his newspapers Authors: Peters, Lisa Abstract: This presentation discuss four newspapers located in north Wales and the Marches owned by Frederick Edward Roe between 1880 and 1887. It analyses the relationship between the four titles and the exntent to which they shared content, advertising, and staff. Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/10034/263411 2012-07-12T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10034/255437 Title: Using audio feedback to help students improve their work Authors: Bhagat, Julie Abstract: This presentation discusses use of audio feedback in higher education. It comments on current research and best practice, audio feedback as a student engagement tool, and the challenges of using audio feedback. Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/10034/255437 2012-07-09T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/10034/251199 Title: Ethical issues in pedagogic research Authors: Regan, Julie-Anne; Baldwin, Moyra A; Peters, Lisa Abstract: This paper explores the ethical issues identified by a research ethics committee (REC) over a three-year period. The REC is situated in a medium-sized univerity in the north west of England and deals exclusively with proposals for pedagogic research. The purpose of the research was to identify the nature and frequency of ethical concerns expressed by the REC, in order to improve guidance for future applicants. The most common concern was the lack, or inaccuracy, of the information provided to potential participants by which they were expected to make an informed decision about participation. Other concerns included the potential for bias, the lack of information provided to the REC, the provision for fair access by vulnerable groups and undue influence on voluntary particpation. The paper concludes that the potential risks of practitioners researching their own students are not given due consideration by many applicats. In particular the potential threats to valid informed consent are identified. Implications for improving the relationship between researchers and RECs are discussed, as is the guidance for applicants. Description: This article is not available through ChesterRep. It is available at http://www.beds.ac.uk/learning/support/jpd Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/10034/251199 2012-10-01T00:00:00Z